ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2012
In vitro modelling of cortical neurogenesis by sequential induction of human umbilical cord blood stem cells.
Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Prospects for the therapeutic development of umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells.World journal of stem cells · 2020Review
- An Overview on Human Umbilical Cord Blood Stem Cell-Based Alternative In Vitro Models for Developmental Neurotoxicity Assessment.Molecular neurobiology · 2016Review
- Repairing neural injuries using human umbilical cord blood.Molecular neurobiology · 2013Review
- Cord blood Lin(-)CD45(-) embryonic-like stem cells are a heterogeneous population that lack self-renewal capacity.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Neurogenesis of excitatory neurons in the developing human cerebral neocortex is a complex and dynamic set of processes and the exact mechanisms controlling the specification of human neocortical neuron subtypes are poorly understood due to lack of relevant cell models available. It has been shown that the transcription factors Pax6, Tbr2 and Tbr1, which are sequentially expressed in the rodent neocortex, regulate and define corticogenesis of glutamatergic neocortical neurons. In humans the homologues of these genes are generally expressed in a similar pattern, but with some differences. In this study, we used purified human umbilical cord blood stem cells, expressing pluripotency marker genes (OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG), to model human neocortical neurogenesis in vitro. We analyzed the expression patterns of PAX6, TBR2 and TBR1, at both protein and mRNA levels, throughout the 24 days of a sequential neuronal induction protocol. Their expression patterns correlated with those found in the developing human neocortex where they define different developmental stages of neocortical neurons. The derived cord blood neuron-like cells expressed a number of neuronal markers. They also expressed components of glutamatergic neurotransmission including glutamate receptor subunits and transporters, and generated calcium influxes upon stimulation with glutamate. Thus we have demonstrated that it is possible to model neocortical neurogenesis using cord blood stem cells in vitro. This may allow detailed analysis of the molecular mechanisms regulating neocortical neuronal specification, thus aiding the development of potential therapeutic tools for diseases and injuries of the cerebral cortex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.