Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21677394›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetics2011

The first genetic map of pigeon pea based on diversity arrays technology (DArT) markers.

Shi Ying Yang, Rachit K Saxena, Pawan L Kulwal, Gavin J Ash, Anuja Dubey, John D I Harper, Hari D Upadhyaya, Ragini Gothalwal, Andrzej Kilian, Rajeev K Varshney

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Genetics and breeding for climate change in Orphan crops.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Review
  8. Genomics-assisted breeding for pigeonpea improvement.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shi Ying YangDiversity Arrays Technology Pty Limited, 1 Wilf Crane Crescent, Yarralumla, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia.
Rachit K Saxena
Pawan L Kulwal
Gavin J Ash
Anuja Dubey
John D I Harper
Hari D Upadhyaya
Ragini Gothalwal
Andrzej Kilian
Rajeev K Varshney

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With an objective to develop a genetic map in pigeon pea (Cajanus spp.), a total of 554 diversity arrays technology (DArT) markers showed polymorphism in a pigeon pea F(2) mapping population of 72 progenies derived from an interspecific cross of ICP 28 (Cajanus cajan) and ICPW 94 (Cajanus scarabaeoides). Approximately 13% of markers did not conform to expected segregation ratio. The total number of DArT marker loci segregating in Mendelian manner was 405 with 73.1% (P > 0.001) of DArT markers having unique segregation patterns. Two groups of genetic maps were generated using DArT markers. While the maternal genetic linkage map had 122 unique DArT maternal marker loci, the paternal genetic linkage map has a total of 172 unique DArT paternal marker loci. The length of these two maps covered 270.0 cM and 451.6 cM, respectively. These are the first genetic linkage maps developed for pigeon pea, and this is the first report of genetic mapping in any grain legume using diversity arrays technology.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingCajanusChromosomes, PlantGenetic LinkageHybridization, GeneticOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.