Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21677306›Full record

ArticleBiology of reproduction2011

Inhibition of ovarian KIT phosphorylation by the ovotoxicant 4-vinylcyclohexene diepoxide in rats.

Connie J Mark-Kappeler, Nivedita Sen, Ashley Lukefahr, Laurel McKee, I Glenn Sipes, John Konhilas, Patricia B Hoyer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of reproduction, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. 4-vinylcyclohexene diepoxide: a model chemical for ovotoxicity.Systems biology in reproductive medicine · 2012
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Connie J Mark-KappelerDepartment of Physiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Nivedita Sen
Ashley Lukefahr
Laurel McKee
I Glenn Sipes
John Konhilas
Patricia B Hoyer
University of Arizona · US

Funding

SOUTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES CENTERP30ES006694 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI DEAN BILLHEIMER · 1994 to 2026
$36.7M
Training in Environmental Toxicology of Human DiseaseT32ES007091 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Nathan J Cherrington · 1985 to 2026
$10.7M
SIGNALING PATHWAYS IN CHEMICAL INDUCED OVOTOXICITYR01ES009246 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI HOYER, PATRICIA B · 1999 to 2010
$2.8M
Impact of AMP-activated kinase on sex differences in hypertrophic cardiomyopathyR01HL098256 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI KONHILAS, JOHN P · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098256NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES006694NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES009246NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro exposure of Postnatal Day 4 (PND4) rat ovaries to the occupational chemical 4-vinylcyclohexene diepoxide (VCD) destroys specifically primordial and primary follicles via acceleration of atresia. Because oocyte-expressed c-kit (KIT) plays a critical role in follicle survival and activation, a direct interaction of VCD with KIT as its mechanism of ovotoxicity was investigated. PND4 rat ovaries were cultured with and without VCD (30 μM) for 2 days. When assessed by Western analysis or mobility shift detection, phosphorylated KIT (pKIT) was decreased (P < 0.05) by VCD exposure, while total KIT protein was unaffected. Anti-mouse KIT2 (ACK2) antibody binds KIT and blocks its signaling pathways, whereas anti-mouse KIT 4 (ACK4) antibody binds KIT but does not block its activity. PND4 rat ovaries were incubated for 2 days with and without VCD with and without ACK2 (80 μg/ml) or ACK4 (80 μg/ml). ACK2 decreased pKIT; however, ACK4 had no effect. Conversely, ACK2 did not affect a VCD-induced decrease in pKIT, whereas ACK4 further reduced it. Because ACK2 and ACK4 (known to directly bind KIT) affect VCD responses, these results support the fact that VCD interacts directly with KIT. The effect of these antibodies on VCD-induced follicle loss was measured after 8 days of incubation. ACK2 further reduced (P < 0.05) VCD-induced follicle loss, whereas ACK4 did not affect it. These findings demonstrate that VCD induces ovotoxicity by direct inhibition of KIT autophosphorylation of the oocyte. The data also further support the vital function of KIT and its signaling pathway in primordial follicle survival and activation, as well as its role in VCD-induced ovotoxicity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornAntibodies, BlockingAntigen-Antibody ReactionsCyclohexenesEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleFollicular AtresiaLigandsMolecular Targeted TherapyMolecular WeightOrgan Culture TechniquesOvarian FollicleOvaryPhosphorylationProtein Kinase Inhibitors4-vinyl-1-cyclohexene dioxideAntibodies, BlockingCyclohexenesEnvironmental PollutantsLigandsProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitVinyl Compounds

Identifiers

PMID21677306
PMCPMC3184290
OpenAlexW2125417261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.