Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21677117›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion practice2012

Exploring a public health perspective on pedestrian planning.

Kelly R Evenson, Sara B Satinsky, Daniel A Rodríguez, Semra A Aytur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion practice, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly R EvensonUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Sara B Satinsky
Daniel A Rodríguez
Semra A Aytur
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of New Hampshire · US

Funding

UNC Center for Health Promotion and Disease PreventionU48DP000059 · DP · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI AMMERMAN, ALICE S · 2004 to 2009
$14.4M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP000059NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48-DP000059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A pedestrian plan is a public document that explains a community's vision and goals for future pedestrian activity. This study explored whether involvement by public health professionals in the development of pedestrian plans was associated with certain characteristics of the plan (vision, goals, identified programs, and evaluation). This study identified, collected, and analyzed content of all pedestrian plans in North Carolina through 2008. Among the 46 plans, 39% reported involvement by public health professionals in their development. Overall, 72% of pedestrian plans included a vision statement; health was mentioned four times and quality of life was mentioned five times. Slightly more than half (52%) of the plans included goals to improve public health. Plans that involved public health professionals more often included the type of physical activity, safety, or education program. Only 22% of all pedestrian plans included a proposal to evaluate their implementation. Plans that included public health professionals were less likely to include an evaluation proposal (11%) compared with those that did not involve public health professionals (21%). Public health professionals are encouraged to seek involvement in the pedestrian planning process, particularly in the areas of health program development, implementation, and evaluation.

Indexed as

Public Health PracticeWalkingCommunity NetworksHealth EducationHealth Plan ImplementationHealth PromotionHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationNorth CarolinaPractice Patterns, Physicians'Regional Medical Programs

Identifiers

PMID21677117
PMCPMC4966667
OpenAlexW2012982736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.