Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21676993›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of psychiatry2011

Budget impact and sustainability of medical care management for persons with serious mental illnesses.

Benjamin G Druss, Silke A von Esenwein, Michael T Compton, Liping Zhao, Douglas L Leslie

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of psychiatry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin G DrussRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. bdruss@emory.edu
Silke A von Esenwein
Michael T Compton
Liping Zhao
Douglas L Leslie
Emory University · US

Funding

Improving Primary Care of Patients with Mental DisordersR01MH070437 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DRUSS, BENJAMIN G · 2004 to 2014
$6.1M
Mentoring and Research: Public Health Interventions to Improve Health in SMIK24MH075867 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DRUSS, BENJAMIN G · 2006 to 2015
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS K24 MH075867NIMH NIH HHS K24MH075867NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH070437NIMH NIH HHS R01MH070437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe authors assessed the 2-year outcomes, costs, and financial sustainability of a medical care management intervention for community mental health settings.

methodA total of 407 psychiatric outpatients with serious mental illnesses were randomly assigned to usual care or to a medical care manager who provided care coordination and education. Two-year follow-up chart reviews and interviews assessed quality and outcomes of care, as well as costs from both the health system and managerial perspectives.

resultsSustained improvements were observed in the intervention group in quality of primary care preventive services, quality of cardiometabolic care, and mental health-related quality of life. From a health system perspective, by year 2, the mean per-patient total costs for the intervention group were $932 (95% CI=-1,973 to 102) less than for the usual care group, with a 92.3% probability that the program was associated with lower costs than usual care. From the community mental health center perspective, the program would break even (i.e., revenues would cover setup costs) if 58% or more of clients had Medicaid or another form of insurance. Given that only 40.5% of clients in this study had Medicaid, the program was not sustainable after grant funding ended.

conclusionsThe positive long-term outcomes and favorable cost profile provide evidence of the potential value of this model. However, the discrepancy between health system and managerial cost perspectives limited the program's financial sustainability. With anticipated insurance expansions under health reform, there is likely to be a stronger business case for safety net organizations considering implementing evidence-based interventions such as the one examined in this study.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsAdolescentAdultBudgetsCommunity Mental Health ServicesCost-Benefit AnalysisFollow-Up StudiesHealth Care ReformHumansMedicaidMental DisordersMental HealthMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID21676993
PMCPMC3775649
OpenAlexW2063385400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.