Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21676934›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2011

Order of operations for decoding superior colliculus activity for saccade generation.

Husam A Katnani, Neeraj J Gandhi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. How is visual salience computed in the brain? Insights from behaviour, neurobiology and modelling.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Response normalization in the superficial layers of the superior colliculus as a possible mechanism for saccadic averaging.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Updating of an occluded moving target for interceptive saccades.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Husam A KatnaniDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. hkatnani@gmail.com
Neeraj J Gandhi
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Virus Production and Manipulation of Protein/Gene Expression ModuleP30EY008098 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Ethan A Rossi · 1989 to 2026
$17.8M
Predoctoral Training Program in Behavioral Brain ResearchT32GM081760 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FIEZ, JULIE A, HOLT, LORI L · 2007 to 2021
$4.3M
Neural Integration of Eye and Head MovementsR01EY015485 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GANDHI, NEERAJ J · 2004 to 2011
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008098NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015485NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC0025205NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM081760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To help understand the order of events that occurs when generating saccades, we simulated and tested two commonly stated decoding models that are believed to occur in the oculomotor system: vector averaging (VA) and center-of-mass. To generate accurate saccades, each model incorporates two required criteria: 1) a decoding mechanism that deciphers a population response of the superior colliculus (SC) and 2) an exponential transformation that converts the saccade vector into visual coordinates. The order of these two criteria is used differently within each model, yet the significance of the sequence has not been quantified. To distinguish between each decoding sequence and hence, to determine the order of events necessary to generate accurate saccades, we simulated the two models. Distinguishable predictions were obtained when two simultaneous motor commands are processed by each model. Experimental tests of the models were performed by observing the distribution of endpoints of saccades evoked by weighted, simultaneous microstimulation of two SC sites. The data were consistent with the predictions of the VA model, in which exponential transformation precedes the decoding computation.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAnimalsMacaca mulattaMalePhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceSaccadesSuperior Colliculi

Identifiers

PMID21676934
PMCPMC3174826
OpenAlexW2013506584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.