Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21676132›Full record

Trial reportBipolar disorders2011

Multisite, open-label, prospective trial of lamotrigine for geriatric bipolar depression: a preliminary report.

Martha Sajatovic, Ariel Gildengers, Rayan K Al Jurdi, Laszlo Gyulai, Kristin A Cassidy, Rebecca L Greenberg, Martha L Bruce, Benoit H Mulsant, Thomas Ten Have, Robert C Young

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bipolar disorders, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Assessing bipolar disorder in the older adult: the GERI-BD toolbox.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2018
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Elderly Bipolar Disorder.Current psychiatry reports · 2021
    Review
  11. Dreams, Sleep, and Psychotropic Drugs.Frontiers in neurology · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Asenapine in the treatment of older adults with bipolar disorder.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Prophylaxis and treatment of bipolar disorder in older adults.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Martha SajatovicDepartment of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA. martha.sajatovic@uhhospitals.org
Ariel Gildengers
Rayan K Al Jurdi
Laszlo Gyulai
Kristin A Cassidy
Rebecca L Greenberg
Martha L Bruce
Benoit H Mulsant
Thomas Ten Have
Robert C Young
Cornell University · USCase Western Reserve University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Treatment of Bipolar Disorder in Old AgeK02MH067028 · NIMH · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI YOUNG, ROBERT C. · 2003 to 2013
$1.2M
CIHRNIMH NIH HHS K02 MH067028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis is a multisite, 12-week, open-label trial of lamotrigine augmentation in 57 older adults (≥ 60 years; mean ± SD age = 66.5 ± 6.7 years) with either type I or type II bipolar depression.

methodsPrimary outcome measure was change from baseline on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Secondary outcome measures included Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar version (CGI-BP), and the WHO-Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II). The Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser (UKU) was used to assess side effects.

resultsA total of 77.2% of the study subjects had bipolar I disorder. The mean (SD) lamotrigine dose was 150.9 (68.5) mg/day. There was significant improvement in the MADRS, HAM-D, CGI-BP, and in most domains on the WHO-DAS II. For patients for whom final MADRS score was available: 31 (57.4%) met remission criteria and 35 (64.8%) met response criteria. There were 19/57 (33.3%) who dropped out of the study prematurely, with 6 dropouts due to adverse events (4 cases of rash, 1 manic switch, and 1 hyponatremia). Two cases of rash were possibly drug related and were resolved with drug discontinuation. The most common UKU adverse effects were reduced sleep duration (n = 14, 24.6%), weight loss (n = 12, 21.1%), increased dream activity (n = 12, 21.1%), polyuria/polydipsia (n = 11, 19.3%), weight gain (n = 9, 15.8%), diminished sexual desire (n = 9, 15.8%), increased sleep (n = 9, 15.8%), lassitude/fatigue (n = 8, 14%), and unsteady gait (n = 8, 14%). No significant changes in electrocardiogram or laboratory tests were observed.

conclusionsIn bipolar depressed elders, lamotrigine was associated with improvement in depression, psychopathology, and functional status. There was a moderate number of adverse events, although relationship of adverse events (particularly falls) to study medication could not be clearly determined in this uncontrolled trial. Controlled studies are needed to further evaluate efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine therapy in geriatric bipolar depression.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntimanic AgentsBipolar DisorderDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansLamotrigineMaleMiddle AgedPatient DropoutsProspective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesTime FactorsTriazinesAntimanic AgentsLamotrigineTriazines

Identifiers

PMID21676132
PMCPMC3610426
OpenAlexW1940801264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.