Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21676054›Full record

Trial reportAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2011

A randomized trial of a multicomponent cessation strategy for emergency department smokers.

Steven L Bernstein, Polly Bijur, Nina Cooperman, Saba Jearld, Julia H Arnsten, Alyson Moadel, E John Gallagher

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07119658 (Targeting Metabolic Syndrome From the Emergency Department Through Mixed-Methods), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07119658 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Targeting Metabolic Syndrome From the Emergency Department Through Mixed-Methods: Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndiana UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsHypertension, Hyperglycemia, Dyslipidemia, Metabolic SyndromeArmsComposite intervention to address MetS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. A Parental Smoking Cessation Intervention in the Pediatric Emergency Setting: A Randomized Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. A Multicomponent Intervention Including Texting to Promote Tobacco Abstinence in Emergency Department Smokers: A Pilot Study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2016
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven L BernsteinMontefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Bronx, New York, USA. Steven.bernstein@yale.edu
Polly Bijur
Nina Cooperman
Saba Jearld
Julia H Arnsten
Alyson Moadel
E John Gallagher
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USYeshiva University · US

Funding

Strategies to Help Adult ER Patients Quit SmokingR21DA017812 · NIDA · MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER (BRONX, NY) · PI BERNSTEIN, STEVEN L. · 2005 to 2006
$298k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA017812NIDA NIH HHS R21DA017812
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objective was to determine the efficacy of an emergency department (ED)-based smoking cessation intervention.

methodsThis study was a randomized trial conducted from January 2006 to September 2007 at an urban ED that treats 90,000 adults per year. Discharged adults who smoked at least 10 cigarettes per day were randomized to 1) usual care, receiving a smoking cessation brochure; or 2) enhanced care, receiving the brochure, a motivational interview (MI), nicotine patches, and a phone call at 3 days. Interventions were performed by a peer educator trained in tobacco treatment. Blinded follow-up was performed at 3 months.

resultsA total of 338 subjects were enrolled, mean (±SD) age was 40.2 (±12.0) years, 51.8% were female, and 56.5% were either self-pay or Medicaid. Demographic and clinical variables were comparable between groups. Enhanced and usual care arms showed similar cessation rates at 3 months (14.7% vs. 13.2%, respectively). The proportion of subjects making a quit attempt (69.2% vs. 66.5%) and decrease in daily cigarette use (five vs. one; all p > 0.05) were also similar. In logistic modeling, factors associated with quitting included any tobacco-related International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision (ICD-9), code for the ED visit (odds ratio [OR]= 3.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.61 to 7.26) or subject belief that the ED visit was tobacco-related (OR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.17 to 5.21). Conversely, subjects who reported having a preexisting tobacco-related illness were less likely to quit (OR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.50).

conclusionsThe primary endpoint was negative, reflecting a higher-than-expected quit rate in the control group. Subjects whose ED visit was tobacco-related, based either on physician diagnosis or subject perception, were more than twice as likely to quit. These data suggest that even low-intensity screening and referral may prompt substantial numbers of ED smokers to quit or attempt to quit.

Indexed as

AdultCultural CompetencyEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalSmoking CessationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21676054
PMCPMC3117220
OpenAlexW1842492603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.