Biomedical journal editing: elements of success.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Using Guidelines to Improve Scientific Writing: Tips on Use of Correct Verb Tenses for Non-Native English-Speaking Researchers.Journal of Korean medical science · 2022
   Article
2. Editorial Strategy to Get a Scholarly Journal Indexed by Scopus.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2021
   Article
3. Guidelines for Editing Biomedical Journals: Recommended by Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2020
   Article
4. Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication.Journal of Korean medical science · 2015
   Review
5. Rewarding peer reviewers: maintaining the integrity of science communication.Journal of Korean medical science · 2015
   Review
6. Reference accuracy: authors', reviewers', editors', and publishers' contributions.Journal of Korean medical science · 2014
   Article
7. Factors Affecting Journal Quality Indicator in Scopus (SCImago Journal Rank) in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals: a Longitudinal Study (1999-2013).Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2014
   Article
8. Comparison Between Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Metrics, and SCimago Journal Rank Indicator of Pediatric Neurology Journals.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2014
   Article
9. Multidisciplinary bibliographic databases.Journal of Korean medical science · 2013
   Article
10. Choosing the target journal: do authors need a comprehensive approach?Journal of Korean medical science · 2013
    Article
11. Selecting your editorial board: maintaining standards.Journal of Korean medical science · 2013
    Article
12. Bibliographic databases: some critical points.Journal of Korean medical science · 2013
    Article
13. A scientometric study of general internal medicine domain among muslim countries of middle East (1991 - 2011).Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2013
    Article
14. Acta informatica medica is indexed in pubmed and archived in pubmed central.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2013
    Article
15. Plagiarism in scientific publishing.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2012
    Article
16. Ethical aspects and dilemmas of preparing, writing and publishing of the scientific papers in the biomedical journals.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2012
    Article
17. Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals.Croatian medical journal · 2012
    Article
18. Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics.Rheumatology international · 2012
    Review
19. On-line biomedical databases-the best source for quick search of the scientific information in the biomedicine.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2012
    Article
20. The influence of Iranian scientific journals in disseminating medical information.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2012
    Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as