Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21674825›Full record

ArticleCroatian medical journal2011

New cell separation technique for the isolation and analysis of cells from biological mixtures in forensic caseworks.

Cai-xia Li, Gui-qiang Wang, Wan-shui Li, Jiang-ping Huang, An-quan Ji, Lan Hu

Open access · diamondAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Croatian medical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. New Perspectives for Whole Genome Amplification in Forensic STR Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Technologies for Single-Cell Isolation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cai-xia LiInstitute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Public Security, Beijing, China.
Gui-qiang Wang
Wan-shui Li
Jiang-ping Huang
An-quan Ji
Lan Hu
Ministry of Public Security of the People's Republic of China · CNInstitute of Forensic Science · CNChina People's Public Security University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo isolate mucosal cells of the perpetrator in a sexual assault case from a complex mixture of his mucosal cells and the victim's skin by micromanipulation prior to genomic analysis.

methodsTo capture and analyze mucosal cells we used the micromanipulation with on-chip low volume polymerase chain reaction (LV-PCR). Consensus DNA profiles were generated from 5 replicate experiments. RESULTS AND

conclusionsWe validated the use of micromanipulation with on-chip LV-PCR for genomic analysis of complex biological mixtures in a fatal rape case. The perpetrator's mucosal cells were captured from nipple swabs of the victim, and a single-source DNA profile was generated from cell mixtures. These data suggest that micromanipulation with on-chip LV-PCR is an effective forensic tool for the analysis of specific cells from complex samples.

Indexed as

Cell SeparationCrimeDNAElectrophoresisForensic SciencesGenetic MarkersGenotypeHomicideHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsRapeDNAGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID21674825
PMCPMC3118714
OpenAlexW1971008592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.