Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21674291›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2012

A novel recirculating flow-perfusion bioreactor for periosteal chondrogenesis.

Yih-Wen Tarng, Bing-Feng Huang, Fong-Chin Su

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yih-Wen TarngInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Bing-Feng Huang
Fong-Chin Su
National Cheng Kung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrevious research indicated that engineered cartilage was soft and fragile due to less extracellular matrix than native articular cartilage. Consequently, the focus of this study was mostly confined to application in vitro function. In order to generate 3D engineered cartilage resembling native articular cartilage, we developed a recirculating flow-perfusion bioreactor to simulate the motion of a native diarthrodial joint by offering shear stress and hydrodynamic pressure simultaneously. MATERIALS: The bioreactor we developed offers steady oscillating laminar flow (maximum shear stress of 250 dyne/cm(2)) and hydrodynamic pressure (increased from 0 to 15 psi) simultaneously. The periosteal explants were harvested from the proximal medial tibiae of rabbits and fixed onto PCL scaffold with four corner sutures and cambium layer facing upward, then these periosteal composites (periosteum/ PCL) were placed into the culture chamber of our bioreactor for six weeks in vitro culture.

resultsThe cartilage yield in our recirculating bioreactor was 75-85%. The outcome was better than the 65-75% in the spinner flask bioreactor (shear stress only) and 17% in static culture. In addition, there was a significant difference in the cell morphology and zonal organisation among the three methods of culture; the engineered cartilage in the recirculating bioreactor presented many more characteristics of native articular cartilage.

conclusionsIf the environment of culture provides the shear stress and hydrodynamic pressure simultaneously, the composition of the engineered cartilage resembles native articular cartilage, including their ECM composition, cell distribution, zonal organisation and mechanical properties.

Indexed as

BioreactorsAnimalsBatch Cell Culture TechniquesCartilage, ArticularCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationChondrocytesChondrogenesisEquipment DesignMechanotransduction, CellularModels, AnimalPeriosteumRabbitsTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID21674291
PMCPMC3311809
OpenAlexW1966697569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.