Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21674173›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2011

Montelukast was inefficient in maintaining steroid-induced remission in adult eosinophilic esophagitis.

Alfredo J Lucendo, Livia C De Rezende, Susana Jiménez-Contreras, Jose Luis Yagüe-Compadre, Jesús González-Cervera, Teresa Mota-Huertas, Danila Guagnozzi, Teresa Angueira, Sonia González-Castillo, Angel Arias

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. The prevalence and diagnostic utility of endoscopic features of eosinophilic esophagitis: a meta-analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Technical review on the management of eosinophilic esophagitis: a report from the AGA institute and the joint task force on allergy-immunology practice parameters.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. The Role of the Environment in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Correction to: Eosinophilic esophagitis.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Eosinophilic esophagitis.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alfredo J LucendoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hospital General de Tomelloso, Vereda de Socuéllamos, s/n, 13700, Tomelloso, Ciudad Real, Spain. alucendo@vodafone.es
Livia C De Rezende
Susana Jiménez-Contreras
Jose Luis Yagüe-Compadre
Jesús González-Cervera
Teresa Mota-Huertas
Danila Guagnozzi
Teresa Angueira
Sonia González-Castillo
Angel Arias
Hospital General de Tomelloso · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsLeukotriene D4 is produced by and functions as a chemotactic factor for eosinophils. Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is characterized by esophageal eosinophilic infiltration, determining structural changes and dismotility symptoms. Montelukast, a selective leukotriene D4 receptor antagonist, has gained increasing consideration as a therapeutic agent for EoE. However, limited available information has shown that montelukast is not effective in reducing eosinophilic infiltration. Our paper aims at evaluating whether montelukast could be consider as a steroid-sparing therapy by assessing its efficacy in maintaining both clinical and histopathological remission achieved after topical corticosteroids in adult EoE patients.

methodsEleven consecutively diagnosed adult EoE patients were prospectively studied. Esophageal biopsies were obtained before and after a 6-month treatment with fluticasone propionate 400 μg/twice a day. Immediately after that, montelukast 10 mg/day was instituted. A new endoscopy was foreseen after a new 3-month period, or as soon as the patients presented esophageal symptoms. Symptoms were assessed by using a questionnaire before and after fluticasone propionate treatment and after montelukast therapy.

resultsEosinophils density into the esophageal epithelium and lamina propria was significantly reduced after a 6-month treatment with topical steroids (P = 0.003) and increased to levels similar to baseline level into the first 3 months after treatment with montelukast. Baseline symptom scores significantly decreased after treatment with topical steroids (P = 0.003) and increased again after montelukast therapy, but baseline levels improved.

conclusionsMontelukast was not efficient in maintaining the histopathological or clinical response achieved by topical steroids in adult EoE patients.

Indexed as

AcetatesAdultAndrostadienesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiopsyCyclopropanesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationEndoscopy, GastrointestinalEosinophilic EsophagitisFemaleFluticasoneFollow-Up StudiesHumansLeukotriene AntagonistsMaleAcetatesAndrostadienesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsCyclopropanesFluticasoneLeukotriene AntagonistsmontelukastQuinolinesSulfides

Identifiers

PMID21674173
OpenAlexW2027881380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.