ArticlePloS one2011
p53 transactivation and the impact of mutations, cofactors and small molecules using a simplified yeast-based screening system.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural Basis of Mutation-Dependent p53 Tetramerization Deficiency.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- ExploringMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2021Review
- The complex architecture of p53 binding sites.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Article
- Extracellular and Intracellular Factors in Brain Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Time to first treatment and P53 dysfunction in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: results of the O-CLL1 study in early stage patients.Scientific reports · 2020Observational
- Histological classification and expression of markers of canine mast cell tumors.Veterinary world · 2020Article
- A Protein in the YeastBiomolecules · 2020Article
- The Influence of Quadruplex Structure in Proximity to P53 Target Sequences on the Transactivation Potential of P53 Alpha Isoforms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- P63 modulates the expression of the WDFY2 gene which is implicated in cancer regulation and limb development.Bioscience reports · 2019Article
- Etoposide-resistance in a neuroblastoma model cell line is associated with 13q14.3 mono-allelic deletion and miRNA-15a/16-1 down-regulation.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Reactivation of TAp73 tumor suppressor by protoporphyrin IX, a metabolite of aminolevulinic acid, induces apoptosis inCell division · 2018Article
- TP63 mutations are frequent in cutaneous melanoma, support UV etiology, but their role in melanomagenesis is unclear.Oncology reports · 2017Article
- p53, p63 and p73 in the wonderland ofOncotarget · 2017Review
- Evolution of p53 transactivation specificity through the lens of a yeast-based functional assay.PloS one · 2015Article
- Quantitative Analysis of NF-κB Transactivation Specificity Using a Yeast-Based Functional Assay.PloS one · 2015Article
- JNK-NQO1 axis drives TAp73-mediated tumor suppression upon oxidative and proteasomal stress.Cell death & disease · 2014Article
- ∆N-P63α and TA-P63α exhibit intrinsic differences in transactivation specificities that depend on distinct features of DNA target sites.Oncotarget · 2014Article
- Identification of new p53 target microRNAs by bioinformatics and functional analysis.BMC cancer · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe p53 tumor suppressor, which is altered in most cancers, is a sequence-specific transcription factor that is able to modulate the expression of many target genes and influence a variety of cellular pathways. Inactivation of the p53 pathway in cancer frequently occurs through the expression of mutant p53 protein. In tumors that retain wild type p53, the pathway can be altered by upstream modulators, particularly the p53 negative regulators MDM2 and MDM4. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsGiven the many factors that might influence p53 function, including expression levels, mutations, cofactor proteins and small molecules, we expanded our previously described yeast-based system to provide the opportunity for efficient investigation of their individual and combined impacts in a miniaturized format. The system integrates i) variable expression of p53 proteins under the finely tunable GAL1,10 promoter, ii) single copy, chromosomally located p53-responsive and control luminescence reporters, iii) enhanced chemical uptake using modified ABC-transporters, iv) small-volume formats for treatment and dual-luciferase assays, and v) opportunities to co-express p53 with other cofactor proteins. This robust system can distinguish different levels of expression of WT and mutant p53 as well as interactions with MDM2 or 53BP1. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We found that the small molecules Nutlin and RITA could both relieve the MDM2-dependent inhibition of WT p53 transactivation function, while only RITA could impact p53/53BP1 functional interactions. PRIMA-1 was ineffective in modifying the transactivation capacity of WT p53 and missense p53 mutations. This dual-luciferase assay can, therefore, provide a high-throughput assessment tool for investigating a matrix of factors that can influence the p53 network, including the effectiveness of newly developed small molecules, on WT and tumor-associated p53 mutants as well as interacting proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.