Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21673985›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex mycobacteria as amoeba-resistant organisms.

Felix Mba Medie, Iskandar Ben Salah, Bernard Henrissat, Didier Raoult, Michel Drancourt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in tuberculosis · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Morphological Characterization and Genotyping ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2024
    Article
  6. Molecular detection and genotype identification ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Microbial warfare in the wild-the impact of protists on the evolution and virulence of bacterial pathogens.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Measurable genomic changes inJournal of bacteriology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Insights From the Genome Sequence ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The many lives of nontuberculous mycobacteria.Journal of bacteriology · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Felix Mba MedieUnité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes, UMR 6236 CNRS-Université de la Méditerranée, IRD 189, IFR 48, Faculté de Médecine, Marseille, France.
Iskandar Ben Salah
Bernard Henrissat
Didier Raoult
Michel Drancourt
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement · FRUnité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost environmental non-tuberculous mycobacteria have been demonstrated to invade amoebal trophozoites and cysts, but such relationships are largely unknown for members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. An environmental source has been proposed for the animal Mycobacterium bovis and the human Mycobacterium canettii. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsUsing optic and electron microscopy and co-culture methods, we observed that 89±0.6% of M. canettii, 12.4±0.3% of M. tuberculosis, 11.7±2% of M. bovis and 11.2±0.5% of Mycobacterium avium control organisms were phagocytized by Acanthamoeba polyphaga, a ratio significantly higher for M. canettii (P = 0.03), correlating with the significantly larger size of M. canetti organisms (P = 0.035). The percentage of intraamoebal mycobacteria surviving into cytoplasmic vacuoles was 32±2% for M. canettii, 26±1% for M. tuberculosis, 28±2% for M. bovis and 36±2% for M. avium (P = 0.57). M. tuberculosis, M. bovis and M. avium mycobacteria were further entrapped within the double wall of <1% amoebal cysts, but no M. canettii organisms were observed in amoebal cysts. The number of intracystic mycobacteria was significantly (P = 10(-6)) higher for M. avium than for the M. tuberculosis complex, and sub-culturing intracystic mycobacteria yielded significantly more (P = 0.02) M. avium organisms (34×10(4) CFU/mL) than M. tuberculosis (42×10(1) CFU/mL) and M. bovis (35×10(1) CFU/mL) in the presence of a washing fluid free of mycobacteria. Mycobacteria survived in the cysts for up to 18 days and cysts protected M. tuberculosis organisms against mycobactericidal 5 mg/mL streptomycin and 2.5% glutaraldehyde. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These data indicate that M. tuberculosis complex organisms are amoeba-resistant organisms, as previously demonstrated for non-tuberculous, environmental mycobacteria. Intercystic survival of tuberculous mycobacteria, except for M. canettii, protect them against biocides and could play a role in their life cycle.

Indexed as

AcanthamoebaAnimalsHumansMycobacterium bovisMycobacterium tuberculosisTrophozoites

Identifiers

PMID21673985
PMCPMC3108610
OpenAlexW2080606086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.