Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21673743›Full record

ReviewHeredity2011

Recombination rate variation in closely related species.

C S Smukowski, M A F Noor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heredity, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Polymorphic transposable elements contribute to variation in recombination landscapes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Meiosis in bulbous flower speciesFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Digital Image Processing to Detect Adaptive Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C S SmukowskiDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA. css25@duke.edu
M A F Noor

Funding

Fine-scale recombination rate variation within and between Drosophila speciesRC2GM092501 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI COMERON, JOSEP M, JONES, CORBIN D · 2009 to 2010
$1.8M
Fine-scale recombination, variation, divergence, and codon bias in DrosophilaR01GM086445 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KLIMAN, RICHARD M, NOOR, MOHAMED A · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
Genetics of speciation in Drosophila pseudoobscuraR01GM076051 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NOOR, MOHAMED A · 2007 to 2011
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM076051NIGMS NIH HHS GM086445NIGMS NIH HHS GM092501NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076051NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086445NIGMS NIH HHS RC2 GM092501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their importance to successful meiosis and various evolutionary processes, meiotic recombination rates sometimes vary within species or between closely related species. For example, humans and chimpanzees share virtually no recombination hotspot locations in the surveyed portion of the genomes. However, conservation of recombination rates between closely related species has also been documented, raising an apparent contradiction. Here, we evaluate how and why conflicting patterns of recombination rate conservation and divergence may be observed, with particular emphasis on features that affect recombination, and the scale and method with which recombination is surveyed. Additionally, we review recent studies identifying features influencing fine-scale and broad-scale recombination patterns and informing how quickly recombination rates evolve, how changes in recombination impact selection and evolution in natural populations, and more broadly, which forces influence genome evolution.

Indexed as

GenomeRecombination, GeneticAnimalsEukaryotaEvolution, MolecularHumansPan troglodytesSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID21673743
PMCPMC3242630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.