Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21673578›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2011

Storage and use of residual newborn screening blood spots: a public policy emergency.

Beth A Tarini

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biospecimens and Biobanking in Global Health.Clinics in laboratory medicine · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Parents' interest in whole-genome sequencing of newborns.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2014
    Article
  9. Emerging issues in public health genomics.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2014
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Ethical issues with newborn screening in the genomics era.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Beth A TariniDepartment of Pediatrics, Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit, University of Michigan, 300 N. Ingalls Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5456, USA. btarini@umich.edu

Funding

Improving Healthcare Delivery for Infants with Positive Newborn Screening ResultsK23HD057994 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TARINI, BETH A · 2009 to 2013
$662k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD057994NICHD NIH HHS K23HD057994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Blood Specimen CollectionChild Health ServicesHumansNeonatal Screening

Identifiers

PMID21673578
PMCPMC3607938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.