Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21672909›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Protein-network modeling of prostate cancer gene signatures reveals essential pathways in disease recurrence.

James L Chen, Jianrong Li, Walter M Stadler, Yves A Lussier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Computational approaches for the identification of cancer genes and pathways.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Defining a comprehensive verotype using electronic health records for personalized medicine.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Interpreting personal transcriptomes: personalized mechanism-scale profiling of RNA-seq data.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2013
    Article
  15. Deregulation of a Hox protein regulatory network spanning prostate cancer initiation and progression.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James L ChenDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Jianrong Li
Walter M Stadler
Yves A Lussier

Funding

Nation Center: Multi-Scale Study- Cellular Networks(RMI)U54CA121852 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CALIFANO, ANDREA · 2005 to 2015
$37.4M
Semantic Approaches to Phenotypic Databases AnalysesK22LM008308 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LUSSIER, YVES A · 2004 to 2006
$468k
NCI NIH HHS 1U54CA121852-01A1NCI NIH HHS U54 CA121852NLM NIH HHS K22 LM008308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveUncovering the dominant molecular deregulation among the multitude of pathways implicated in aggressive prostate cancer is essential to intelligently developing targeted therapies. Paradoxically, published prostate cancer gene expression signatures of poor prognosis share little overlap and thus do not reveal shared mechanisms. The authors hypothesize that, by analyzing gene signatures with quantitative models of protein-protein interactions, key pathways will be elucidated and shown to be shared.

designThe authors statistically prioritized common interactors between established cancer genes and genes from each prostate cancer signature of poor prognosis independently via a previously validated single protein analysis of network (SPAN) methodology. Additionally, they computationally identified pathways among the aggregated interactors across signatures and validated them using a similarity metric and patient survival. MEASUREMENT: Using an information-theoretic metric, the authors assessed the mechanistic similarity of the interactor signature. Its prognostic ability was assessed in an independent cohort of 198 patients with high-Gleason prostate cancer using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

resultsOf the 13 prostate cancer signatures that were evaluated, eight interacted significantly with established cancer genes (false discovery rate <5%) and generated a 42-gene interactor signature that showed the highest mechanistic similarity (p<0.0001). Via parameter-free unsupervised classification, the interactor signature dichotomized the independent prostate cancer cohort with a significant survival difference (p=0.009). Interpretation of the network not only recapitulated phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase/NF-κB signaling, but also highlighted less well established relevant pathways such as the Janus kinase 2 cascade.

conclusionsSPAN methodology provides a robust means of abstracting disparate prostate cancer gene expression signatures into clinically useful, prioritized pathways as well as useful mechanistic pathways.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingProtein Interaction MappingBiomarkersDisease ProgressionGenomicsHumansJanus Kinase 2Kaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMolecular Targeted TherapyNF-kappa BPhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasePrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsSignal TransductionBiomarkersJAK2 protein, humanJanus Kinase 2NF-kappa BPhosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase

Identifiers

PMID21672909
PMCPMC3128407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.