Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21672409›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2011

Using small-area estimation method to calculate county-level prevalence of obesity in Mississippi, 2007-2009.

Zhen Zhang, Lei Zhang, Alan Penman, Warren May

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Temporal Trends of the Obesity Epidemic in the United States.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Colorectal Cancer in Younger Adults.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Building a Data Platform for Cross-Country Urban Health Studies: the SALURBAL Study.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhen ZhangCenter of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 N. State Street, Jackson, MS 39216, USA. zqin2@umc.edu
Lei Zhang
Alan Penman
Warren May

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObesity is one of Mississippi's pressing public health problems. Since 2005, the state has ranked first in the nation in adult obesity prevalence. For authorities to take targeted action against the obesity epidemic, counties, regions, and subpopulations that are most affected by obesity need to be identified. The objective of this study was to assess the scope, socioeconomic and geographic characteristics, and temporal trends of the obesity epidemic in Mississippi.

methodsUsing 2007-2009 Mississippi Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data and auxiliary data, we applied a small-area estimation method to estimate county-level obesity prevalence in 2007 through 2009, to assess the association between obesity and socioeconomic factors and to evaluate temporal trends. We determined geographic patterns by mapping obesity prevalence. We appraised the precision of estimates by the width of 95% confidence intervals, and we validated our small-area estimates by comparing them with direct estimates.

resultsIn 2009, the county prevalence of obesity ranged from 30.5% to 44.2%. Counties with the highest prevalence of obesity were in the Delta region and along the Mississippi River. The obesity prevalence increased from 2007 through 2009. Age, sex, race, education, and employment status were associated with obesity.

conclusionThe 2009 obesity prevalence in all Mississippi counties was substantially higher than the national average and differed by geography and race. Although urgent intervention measures are needed in the entire state, policies and programs giving higher priority to higher-risk areas and subpopulations identified by this study may be better strategies.

Indexed as

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemPublic HealthAdultFemaleHumansMaleMississippiObesityPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID21672409
PMCPMC3136983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.