Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21671377›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part A2011

Genomic characterization of prenatally detected chromosomal structural abnormalities using oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization.

Peining Li, Pawel Pomianowski, Miriam S DiMaio, Joanne R Florio, Michael R Rossi, Bixia Xiang, Fang Xu, Hui Yang, Qian Geng, Jiansheng Xie and 1 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Changes in and Efficacies of Indications for Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis of Cytogenomic Abnormalities: 13 Years of Experience in a Single Center.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Peining LiDepartment of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. peining.li@yale.edu
Pawel Pomianowski
Miriam S DiMaio
Joanne R Florio
Michael R Rossi
Bixia Xiang
Fang Xu
Hui Yang
Qian Geng
Jiansheng Xie
Maurice J Mahoney
Yale University · USShenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital · CNCity of Hope · US

Funding

MEDICAL GENETICS TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008753 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BALE, ALLEN EVERETT · 2000 to 2008
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5T32GM008753-09NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of chromosomal structural abnormalities using conventional cytogenetic methods poses a challenge for prenatal genetic counseling due to unpredictable clinical outcomes and risk of recurrence. Of the 1,726 prenatal cases in a 3-year period, we performed oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis on 11 cases detected with various structural chromosomal abnormalities. In nine cases, genomic aberrations and gene contents involving a 3p distal deletion, a marker chromosome from chromosome 4, a derivative chromosome 5 from a 5p/7q translocation, a de novo distal 6q deletion, a recombinant chromosome 8 comprised of an 8p duplication and an 8q deletion, an extra derivative chromosome 9 from an 8p/9q translocation, mosaicism for chromosome 12q with added material of initially unknown origin, an unbalanced 13q/15q rearrangement, and a distal 18q duplication and deletion were delineated. An absence of pathogenic copy number changes was noted in one case with a de novo 11q/14q translocation and in another with a familial insertion of 21q into a 19q. Genomic characterization of the structural abnormalities aided in the prediction of clinical outcomes. These results demonstrated the value of aCGH analysis in prenatal cases with subtle or complex chromosomal rearrangements. Furthermore, a retrospective analysis of clinical indications of our prenatal cases showed that approximately 20% of them had abnormal ultrasound findings and should be considered as high risk pregnancies for a combined chromosome and aCGH analysis.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsComparative Genomic HybridizationPrenatal DiagnosisAdultChromosome BandingFemaleGenome, HumanHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePedigreePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID21671377
PMCPMC3745591
OpenAlexW2026811464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.