Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21671049›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurodevelopmental disorders2011

Treatment effects of stimulant medication in young boys with fragile X syndrome.

Jane E Roberts, Margot Miranda, Maria Boccia, Heather Janes, Bridgette L Tonnsen, Deborah D Hatton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. State-of-the-art therapies for fragile X syndrome.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2024
    Review
  2. Targeted Treatments for Fragile X Syndrome.Advances in neurobiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Attention/Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adolescent and Young Adult Males With Fragile X Syndrome.American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities · 2022
    Article
  4. New Therapeutic Options for Fragile X Syndrome.Current treatment options in neurology · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Overview: referrals for genetic evaluation from child psychiatrists.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jane E RobertsDepartment of Psychology, University of South Carolina, 1512 Pendleton Street, Columbia, SC, 29028, USA, jerobert@mailbox.sc.edu.
Margot Miranda
Maria Boccia
Heather Janes
Bridgette L Tonnsen
Deborah D Hatton
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of South Carolina · USGordon-Conwell Theological Seminary · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

UNC MRDD Research CenterP30HD003110 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BELGER, AYSENIL · 1985 to 2012
$28.7M
NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD003110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common inherited form of intellectual disability and is caused by a CGG repeat expansion at Xq27.3 on the FMR1 gene. The majority of young boys with FXS display poor attention and hyperactivity that is disproportionate to their cognitive disability, and approximately 70% meet diagnostic criteria for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychopharmacology is employed with 82% of young males 5-17 years of age, with stimulant medication as the most common medication prescribed. This study evaluated the effects of stimulant medication on the academic performance, attention, motor activity, and psychophysiological arousal of boys with FXS, as well as the concordance of effects within individuals. Participants in this study included 12 boys with FXS who were treated with stimulants. Participants completed videotaped academic testing on two consecutive days and were randomly assigned to be off stimulants for 1 day and on stimulants the other day. On each day, multiple measures including academic performance, behavior regulation, and psychophysiological arousal were collected. Approximately 75% of participants performed better on attention and academic measures, and 70% showed improved physiological regulation while on stimulant medication. A high degree of concordance among measures was found. Lower intelligence quotient (IQ), but not age, correlated with greater improvements in in-seat behavior. IQ and age did not relate to on-task behaviors. The frequency and magnitude of response to stimulant medication in boys with FXS is higher than those reported for most children with non-specific intellectual disabilities and autism spectrum disorder.

Identifiers

PMID21671049
PMCPMC3261280
OpenAlexW2059441543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.