The long-term protective effects of domestic animals in the home.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The indoor air and asthma: the role of cat allergens.Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2012
   Review
2. A cross-sectional analysis of pet-specific immunoglobulin E sensitization and allergic symptomatology and household pet keeping in a birth cohort population.Allergy and asthma proceedings
   Article
3. Wheezing exacerbations in early childhood: evaluation, treatment, and recent advances relevant to the genesis of asthma.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Lifetime dog and cat exposure and dog- and cat-specific sensitization at age 18 years.2011

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as