Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21667298›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2011

Backbone resonance assignment and order tensor estimation using residual dipolar couplings.

Paul Shealy, Yizhou Liu, Mikhail Simin, Homayoun Valafar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sparse labeling of proteins: structural characterization from long range constraints.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2014
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul ShealyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Yizhou Liu
Mikhail Simin
Homayoun Valafar

Funding

Structure and Dynamics of Membrane Proteins from NMR Orientational ConstraintsR01GM081793 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI VALAFAR, HOMAYOUN · 2007 to 2010
$915k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An NMR investigation of proteins with known X-ray structures is of interest in a number of endeavors. Performing these studies through nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) requires the costly step of resonance assignment. The prevalent assignment strategy does not make use of existing structural information and requires uniform isotope labeling. Here we present a rapid and cost-effective method of assigning NMR data to an existing structure-either an X-ray or computationally modeled structure. The presented method, Exhaustively Permuted Assignment of RDCs (EPAR), utilizes unassigned residual dipolar coupling (RDC) data that can easily be obtained by NMR spectroscopy. The algorithm uses only the backbone N-H RDCs from multiple alignment media along with the amino acid type of the RDCs. It is inspired by previous work from Zweckstetter and provides several extensions. We present results on 13 synthetic and experimental datasets from 8 different structures, including two homodimers. Using just two alignment media, EPAR achieves an average assignment accuracy greater than 80%. With three media, the average accuracy is higher than 94%. The algorithm also outputs a prediction of the assignment accuracy, which has a correlation of 0.77 to the true accuracy. This prediction score can be used to establish the needed confidence in assignment accuracy.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBinding SitesNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein ConformationProteinsUbiquitinProteinsUbiquitin

Identifiers

PMID21667298
PMCPMC4071608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.