Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21667284›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2011

X-inactivation and X-reactivation: epigenetic hallmarks of mammalian reproduction and pluripotent stem cells.

Bernhard Payer, Jeannie T Lee, Satoshi H Namekawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Signatures of replication timing, recombination, and sex in the spectrum of rare variants on the human X chromosome and autosomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Epigenetic differences between naïve and primed pluripotent stem cells.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Xist imprinting is promoted by the hemizygous (unpaired) state in the male germ line.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. NaNog: A pluripotency homeobox (master) molecule.Global cardiology science & practice · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bernhard PayerDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. payer@molbio.mgh.harvard.edu
Jeannie T Lee
Satoshi H Namekawa

Funding

Regulation of X-Inactivation by Non-Coding RNA LociR01GM058839 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LEE, JEANNIE T · 1999 to 2025
$6.7M
DNA Damage Response Pathways in Meiotic Sex Chromosome InactivationR01GM098605 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI NAMEKAWA, SATOSHI · 2011 to 2020
$3.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058839NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098605NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM58839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-chromosome inactivation is an epigenetic hallmark of mammalian development. Chromosome-wide regulation of the X-chromosome is essential in embryonic and germ cell development. In the male germline, the X-chromosome goes through meiotic sex chromosome inactivation, and the chromosome-wide silencing is maintained from meiosis into spermatids before the transmission to female embryos. In early female mouse embryos, X-inactivation is imprinted to occur on the paternal X-chromosome, representing the epigenetic programs acquired in both parental germlines. Recent advances revealed that the inactive X-chromosome in both females and males can be dissected into two elements: repeat elements versus unique coding genes. The inactive paternal X in female preimplantation embryos is reactivated in the inner cell mass of blastocysts in order to subsequently allow the random form of X-inactivation in the female embryo, by which both Xs have an equal chance of being inactivated. X-chromosome reactivation is regulated by pluripotency factors and also occurs in early female germ cells and in pluripotent stem cells, where X-reactivation is a stringent marker of naive ground state pluripotency. Here we summarize recent progress in the study of X-inactivation and X-reactivation during mammalian reproduction and development as well as in pluripotent stem cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGenomic ImprintingGerm CellsHumansMaleMammalsModels, BiologicalPluripotent Stem CellsRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, UntranslatedSpecies SpecificityX ChromosomeX Chromosome InactivationRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, UntranslatedXIST non-coding RNA

Identifiers

PMID21667284
PMCPMC3744832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.