ArticleMolecular biology reports2012
Spontaneous uptake of exogenous DNA by goat spermatozoa and selection of donor bucks for sperm-mediated gene transfer.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- First study of sperm mediated gene transfer in Egyptian river buffalo.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2017Article
- Techniques for augmentation of exogenous DNA uptake by ovine spermatozoa.Iranian journal of veterinary research · 2016Article
- In vitro culture and characterization of spermatogonial stem cells on Sertoli cell feeder layer in goat (Capra hircus).Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2014Article
- Transgenesis applied to goat: current applications and ongoing research.Transgenic research · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sperm-mediated gene transfer (SMGT) has been long heralded as a faster and cheaper alternative to more commonly used methods of producing transgenic animals. In this study, the capra semen ejaculates were pooled together and then incubated in vitro with DIG-labeled DNA. The binding and internalizing rates were observed by the in situ hybridization methods. We also compared the standard sperm parameters and the efficiencies of interaction with exogenous DNA of 60 individuals to select donor bucks for SMGT. It was showed that labeled exogenous DNA was detected in different localizations in spermatozoa but genuine DNA uptake, in contrast to mere binding, seems to be limited to the postacrosomal region. The removal of seminal plasma increased significantly (P < 0.01) the capability in picking up exogenous DNA. Use of frozen-thawed semen (without cryoprotectant agents) and Triton X-100 treatment also increased significantly (P < 0.01) the DNA-binding capacity, but reduced the sperm viability. The binding rates (the proportion of labeled-DNA positive spermatozoa to all the spermatozoa counted) of 60 buck individuals were in the range of 3.08-73.39%, and the internalizing rates (the proportion of DNaseI-treated labeled-DNA positive spermatozoa to all the spermatozoa counted) were 4.83-70.00%. About 8.34% (5/60) bucks showed high binding, but low internalizing ability. Chi-square test showed that there was significant difference among the breeds (x(2) = 26.515, P < 0.01). Eight individual bucks that demonstrated high DNA uptake were selected for SMGT. It was demonstrated that the goat spermatozoa was capable of spontaneous uptake of exogenous DNA. Seminal fluid inhibits DNA uptake and that membrane disruption increases DNA binding but greatly diminishes uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21667250What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.