Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21666805›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2011

Patterns and mechanisms of ancestral histone protein inheritance in budding yeast.

Marta Radman-Livaja, Kitty F Verzijlbergen, Assaf Weiner, Tibor van Welsem, Nir Friedman, Oliver J Rando, Fred van Leeuwen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. DNA polymerase delta governs parental histone transfer to DNA replication lagging strand.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Hexasomal particles: consequence or also consequential?Current opinion in genetics & development · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Microbial Adaptation to Enhance Stress Tolerance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  18. Measuring the buffering capacity of gene silencing inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marta Radman-LivajaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Kitty F Verzijlbergen
Assaf Weiner
Tibor van Welsem
Nir Friedman
Oliver J Rando
Fred van Leeuwen
Oncode Institute · NLHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Genomic analysis of histone replacement dynamics in yeastR01GM079205 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI RANDO, OLIVER J · 2008 to 2016
$3.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM079205NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Replicating chromatin involves disruption of histone-DNA contacts and subsequent reassembly of maternal histones on the new daughter genomes. In bulk, maternal histones are randomly segregated to the two daughters, but little is known about the fine details of this process: do maternal histones re-assemble at preferred locations or close to their original loci? Here, we use a recently developed method for swapping epitope tags to measure the disposition of ancestral histone H3 across the yeast genome over six generations. We find that ancestral H3 is preferentially retained at the 5' ends of most genes, with strongest retention at long, poorly transcribed genes. We recapitulate these observations with a quantitative model in which the majority of maternal histones are reincorporated within 400 bp of their pre-replication locus during replication, with replication-independent replacement and transcription-related retrograde nucleosome movement shaping the resulting distributions of ancestral histones. We find a key role for Topoisomerase I in retrograde histone movement during transcription, and we find that loss of Chromatin Assembly Factor-1 affects replication-independent turnover. Together, these results show that specific loci are enriched for histone proteins first synthesized several generations beforehand, and that maternal histones re-associate close to their original locations on daughter genomes after replication. Our findings further suggest that accumulation of ancestral histones could play a role in shaping histone modification patterns.

Indexed as

DNA Replication TimingDNA Topoisomerases, Type IGenes, FungalHistonesInheritance PatternsKineticsModels, BiologicalMutationNucleosomesProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSaccharomycetalesTranscription, GeneticDNA Topoisomerases, Type IHistonesNucleosomesSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21666805
PMCPMC3110181
OpenAlexW1983643062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.