Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21664238›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular endocrinology2011

Corepressor effect on androgen receptor activity varies with the length of the CAG encoded polyglutamine repeat and is dependent on receptor/corepressor ratio in prostate cancer cells.

Grant Buchanan, Eleanor F Need, Jeffrey M Barrett, Tina Bianco-Miotto, Vanessa C Thompson, Lisa M Butler, Villis R Marshall, Wayne D Tilley, Gerhard A Coetzee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular endocrinology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Targeting Androgen Receptor Activation Function-1 with EPI to Overcome Resistance Mechanisms in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Targeting transcription factor corepressors in tumor cells.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Grant BuchananDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Norris Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA. grant.buchanan@adelaide.edu.au
Eleanor F Need
Jeffrey M Barrett
Tina Bianco-Miotto
Vanessa C Thompson
Lisa M Butler
Villis R Marshall
Wayne D Tilley
Gerhard A Coetzee
Hanson Institute · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AUBasil Hetzel Institute · AURoyal Adelaide Hospital · AUUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Prostate Cancer Risk EnhancersR01CA136924 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI COETZEE, GERHARD A, FARNHAM, PEGGY J · 2010 to 2019
$5.4M
AR and RUNX2 target genes in prostate cancerR01CA109147 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI COETZEE, GERHARD A · 2006 to 2010
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109147NCI NIH HHS R01CA109147NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136924NCI NIH HHS R01CA136924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The response of prostate cells to androgens reflects a combination of androgen receptor (AR) transactivation and transrepression, but how these two processes differ mechanistically and influence prostate cancer risk and disease outcome remain elusive. Given recent interest in targeting AR transrepressive processes, a better understanding of AR/corepressor interaction and responses is warranted. Here, we used transactivation and interaction assays with wild-type and mutant ARs, and deletion AR fragments, to dissect the relationship between AR and the corepressor, silencing mediator for retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT). We additionally tested how these processes are influenced by AR agonist and antagonist ligands, as well as by variation in the polyglutamine tract in the AR amino terminal domain (NTD), which is encoded by a polymorphic CAG repeat in the gene. SMRT was recruited to the AR ligand binding domain by agonist ligand, and as determined by the effect of strategic mutations in activation function 2 (AF-2), requires a precise conformation of that domain. A distinct region of SMRT also mediated interaction with the AR-NTD via the transactivation unit 5 (TAU5; residues 315-538) region. The degree to which SMRT was able to repress AR increased from 17% to 56% as the AR polyglutamine repeat length was increased from 9 to 42 residues, but critically this effect could be abolished by increasing the SMRT:AR molar ratio. These data suggest that the extent to which the CAG encoded polyglutamine repeat influences AR activity represents a balance between corepressor and coactivator occupancy of the same ligand-dependent and independent AR interaction surfaces. Changes in the homeostatic relationship of AR to these molecules, including SMRT, may explain the variable penetrance of the CAG repeat and the loss of AR signaling flexibility in prostate cancer progression.

Indexed as

Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidAndrogen Receptor AntagonistsAndrogensAnimalsCell LineChlorocebus aethiopsCo-Repressor ProteinsMaleMutationNuclear Receptor Co-Repressor 2PeptidesProstateProstatic NeoplasmsProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsReceptors, AndrogenTranscriptional ActivationAndrogen Receptor AntagonistsAndrogensCo-Repressor ProteinsNuclear Receptor Co-Repressor 2PeptidespolyglutamineReceptors, Androgen

Identifiers

PMID21664238
PMCPMC3314496
OpenAlexW2062198213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.