Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21663797›Full record

ArticleCell2011

Interlocked feedforward loops control cell-type-specific Rhodopsin expression in the Drosophila eye.

Robert J Johnston, Yoshiaki Otake, Pranidhi Sood, Nina Vogt, Rudy Behnia, Daniel Vasiliauskas, Elizabeth McDonald, Baotong Xie, Sebastian Koenig, Reinhard Wolf and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deep conservation complemented by novelty and innovation in the insect eye ground plan.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Engineered transcription-associated Cas9 targeting in eukaryotic cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Transcriptional priming and chromatin regulation during stochastic cell fate specification.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Insect opsins and evo-devo: what have we learned in 25 years?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. The power of the (imperfect) palindrome: Sequence-specific roles of palindromic motifs in gene regulation.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert J JohnstonDepartment of Biology, New York University, 100 Washington Square East, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Yoshiaki Otake
Pranidhi Sood
Nina Vogt
Rudy Behnia
Daniel Vasiliauskas
Elizabeth McDonald
Baotong Xie
Sebastian Koenig
Reinhard Wolf
Tiffany Cook
Brian Gebelein
Edo Kussell
Hideki Nakagoshi
Claude Desplan
New York University · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USOkayama University · JPUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

Stochastic choices in the retina and optic lobesR01EY013010 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI DESPLAN, CLAUDE · 1999 to 2025
$9.1M
Mechanisms of Homeodomain Transcriptional SpecificityR01GM079428 · NIGMS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI GEBELEIN, BRIAN · 2008 to 2023
$4.5M
Training Program in OrganogenesisT32HD046387 · NICHD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI WYLIE, CHRISTOPHER C · 2006 to 2010
$1.1M
Neuronal connectivity underlying color visionF32EY016309 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI VASILIAUSKAS, DANIEL · 2004 to 2007
$149k
NEI NIH HHS 5F32EY016309-03NEI NIH HHS F32 EY016309NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013010NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD046387NICHD NIH HHS T32HD046387NIGMS NIH HHS GM079428NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079428PHS HHS R0113010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How complex networks of activators and repressors lead to exquisitely specific cell-type determination during development is poorly understood. In the Drosophila eye, expression patterns of Rhodopsins define at least eight functionally distinct though related subtypes of photoreceptors. Here, we describe a role for the transcription factor gene defective proventriculus (dve) as a critical node in the network regulating Rhodopsin expression. dve is a shared component of two opposing, interlocked feedforward loops (FFLs). Orthodenticle and Dve interact in an incoherent FFL to repress Rhodopsin expression throughout the eye. In R7 and R8 photoreceptors, a coherent FFL relieves repression by Dve while activating Rhodopsin expression. Therefore, this network uses repression to restrict and combinatorial activation to induce cell-type-specific expression. Furthermore, Dve levels are finely tuned to yield cell-type- and region-specific repression or activation outcomes. This interlocked FFL motif may be a general mechanism to control terminal cell-fate specification.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEyeFeedback, PhysiologicalHomeodomain ProteinsPhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebrateRhodopsinTranscription FactorsDrosophila Proteinsdve protein, DrosophilaHomeodomain Proteinsoc protein, DrosophilaRhodopsinsalm protein, DrosophilaTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID21663797
PMCPMC3117217
OpenAlexW2039340507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.