Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21663696›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2011

Pragmatic randomised controlled trial of preferred intensity exercise in women living with depression.

Patrick Callaghan, Elizabeth Khalil, Ioannis Morres, Tim Carter

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00546221 (Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial of a Preferred Intensity Exercise Programme to Improve Physiological and Associated Psychological, Social, and Wellbeing Outcomes of Women Living With Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00546221 phase2completednot on this map

Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial of a Preferred Intensity Exercise Programme to Improve Physiological and Associated Psychological, Social, and Wellbeing Outcomes of Women Living With Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2007 to 2009Enrolled43ConditionsDepressionArmsPsychosocial support exercise programme, Prescribed exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Effect of exercise training on psychological outcomes in adults with overweight or obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrick CallaghanFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2HA, UK. Patrick.Callaghan@nottingham.ac.uk
Elizabeth Khalil
Ioannis Morres
Tim Carter

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExercise may be effective in treating depression, but trials testing its effect in depressed women are rare.

aimTo compare the effect of exercise of preferred intensity with exercise of prescribed intensity in thirty-eight women living with depression.

methodsA Pragmatic RCT of 12 sessions of exercise at preferred intensity compared with 12 sessions at prescribed intensity. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale (RSES), General Health Questionnaire 12 (GHQ-12), heart rate (HR), Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (RPE), Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS), Multi-Dimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MDSPSS), SF12 Health Survey and exercise participation rates were compared between groups.

resultsIntervention participants had statistically better BDI (t = 2.638, df = 36, p = 0.006, 95% mean (SD) 26.5 (10.7), CI-20.4 to -2.7, d = 0.86), GHQ-12 (t = 3.284, df = 36, p = 0.001, mean (SD) 8.3 (3.7) 95% CI -6.5 to -1.5, d = 1.08), RSES (t = 2.045, df = 36, p = 0.024, mean (SD) 11.3 (5.8), 95% CI 0.3 -6.4, d = 0.25), QLDS (t = 1.902, df = 36, p = 0.0325, mean (SD) 15.5 (7.9), 95% CI -12.2 -0.4, d = 0.27) RPE scores (t = 1.755, df = 36, p = 0.0475, mean (SD) 9.2 (3.2), 95% CI -.5 - 5.2, d = 0.77) and attended more exercise sessions (t = 1.781, df = 36, p = 0.0415, number of sessions 8 (65%), 95% CI-0.3 -4.8, d = 0.58). SF-12, MSPSS and HR did not differ significantly between groups.

conclusionsExercise of preferred intensity improves psychological, physiological and social outcomes, and exercise participation rates in women living with depression.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00546221.

Indexed as

Physical ExertionAgedDepressionExerciseFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID21663696
PMCPMC3128029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.