Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21663684›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2011

Estimation of allele frequency and association mapping using next-generation sequencing data.

Su Yeon Kim, Kirk E Lohmueller, Anders Albrechtsen, Yingrui Li, Thorfinn Korneliussen, Geng Tian, Niels Grarup, Tao Jiang, Gitte Andersen, Daniel Witte and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Su Yeon KimDepartments of Integrative Biology and Statistics, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. suyeonkim@berkeley.edu
Kirk E Lohmueller
Anders Albrechtsen
Yingrui Li
Thorfinn Korneliussen
Geng Tian
Niels Grarup
Tao Jiang
Gitte Andersen
Daniel Witte
Torben Jorgensen
Torben Hansen
Oluf Pedersen
Jun Wang
Rasmus Nielsen

Funding

Population Genetic Inferences From Dense Genotype DataR01HG003229 · NHGRI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI BUSTAMANTE, CARLOS DANIEL, CLARK, ANDREW G · 2004 to 2013
$4.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003229NHGRI NIH HHS R01-HG003229PHS HHS R01-MHG084695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstimation of allele frequency is of fundamental importance in population genetic analyses and in association mapping. In most studies using next-generation sequencing, a cost effective approach is to use medium or low-coverage data (e.g., < 15X). However, SNP calling and allele frequency estimation in such studies is associated with substantial statistical uncertainty because of varying coverage and high error rates.

resultsWe evaluate a new maximum likelihood method for estimating allele frequencies in low and medium coverage next-generation sequencing data. The method is based on integrating over uncertainty in the data for each individual rather than first calling genotypes. This method can be applied to directly test for associations in case/control studies. We use simulations to compare the likelihood method to methods based on genotype calling, and show that the likelihood method outperforms the genotype calling methods in terms of: (1) accuracy of allele frequency estimation, (2) accuracy of the estimation of the distribution of allele frequencies across neutrally evolving sites, and (3) statistical power in association mapping studies. Using real re-sequencing data from 200 individuals obtained from an exon-capture experiment, we show that the patterns observed in the simulations are also found in real data.

conclusionsOverall, our results suggest that association mapping and estimation of allele frequencies should not be based on genotype calling in low to medium coverage data. Furthermore, if genotype calling methods are used, it is usually better not to filter genotypes based on the call confidence score.

Indexed as

Gene FrequencyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNAGenetics, PopulationGenotypeHumansLikelihood FunctionsPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID21663684
PMCPMC3212839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.