Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21663335›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2011

Drug prescribing before and during pregnancy in south west France: a retrolective study.

Sophie Crespin, Robert Bourrel, Caroline Hurault-Delarue, Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre, Jean-Louis Montastruc, Christine Damase-Michel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Prenatal and perinatal analgesic exposure and autism: an ecological link.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie CrespinService de Pharmacologie Clinique, CHU de Toulouse, Centre Midi-Pyrnes de Pharmacovigilance, de Pharmaco-pidmiologie et dInformation sur le Mdicament, Unit de Pharmaco-pidmiologie, INSERM U1027, Universit de Toulouse, France.
Robert Bourrel
Caroline Hurault-Delarue
Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre
Jean-Louis Montastruc
Christine Damase-Michel
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRInserm · FRl'Assurance Maladie · FRObservatoire Midi-Pyrénées · FRUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral drugs that are known to exhibit teratogenic or fetotoxic risks when used during pregnancy should not be prescribed to pregnant women. However, most women of childbearing age use medications, and drug use cannot always be avoided during pregnancy, especially for women with chronic diseases for whom the benefit of treatment outweighs the potential risk of the drug for the fetus. Nevertheless, it is often possible to replace a drug with another one that has been better evaluated.

objectiveThe aim of the present study was to describe the prescribing of drugs to pregnant women before and during pregnancy in order to examine whether the occurrence of pregnancy modifies drug prescribing and dispensing to women. In particular, drugs that are contraindicated or must be avoided during pregnancy, such as retinoids, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, NSAIDs and valproic acid, will be analysed.

methodsThis retrolective study used data already prospectively recorded in the database of the French Health Insurance Service. It analysed pharmacy records of women who gave birth between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2007 in Midi-Pyrenees. Pharmacy data were analysed from 9 months before pregnancy until delivery. Drugs were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code.

resultsThe study included 23 898 women. Approximately 77% and 96% of the women received at least one prescription before and during pregnancy, respectively. The number of women who were prescribed contraindicated drugs significantly decreased with pregnancy (p < 0.0001). Most of the drugs were stopped during the 3 months before pregnancy without alternative treatment, even for chronic diseases. However, for some women, potentially dangerous prescriptions were maintained during pregnancy, and for others these drugs were dispensed for the first time during critical periods of pregnancy.

conclusionDespite recommendations, some teratogenic and/or fetotoxic drugs are still prescribed and dispensed to pregnant women in France. There is a need to repeat information to sensitize health professionals and women to the harmful potential of drugs. Moreover, discontinuation of a needed treatment must be avoided. Therefore, attention must be given to ensuring that younger females and women of childbearing potential who are likely to need continued treatment in adolescence and adulthood are aware of the potential risks that some drugs may pose during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, Drug-InducedAdolescentAdultContraindicationsDatabases, FactualDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleFranceHumansMiddle AgedPharmaceutical PreparationsPractice Patterns, Physicians'PregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRiskPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID21663335
OpenAlexW1037052724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.