ArticleDrug safety2011
Drug prescribing before and during pregnancy in south west France: a retrolective study.
Article in Drug safety, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Estimating the Prevalence of Prescribed Medication Use in Pregnancy with a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Drug safety · 2026Pooled it
- Maternal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug exposure during pregnancy and risk of miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Characteristics and temporal trends of EU teratological safety signals and information dissemination to healthcare professionals in the Netherlands-A contribution of the ConcePTION project.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Drug purchases prior to conception and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus.The Journal of international medical research · 2022Article
- Early exposure of pregnant women to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs delivered outside hospitals and preterm birth risk: nationwide cohort study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2021Article
- Maternal use of sedative drugs and its effects on pregnancy outcomes: a Finnish birth cohort study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Prescription patterns and factors influencing the use of Chinese herbal medicine among pregnant women in Taiwan: a population-based retrospective study.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2020Article
- Evaluation of gut bacterial community composition and antimicrobial resistome in pregnant and non-pregnant women from Saudi population.Infection and drug resistance · 2019Article
- Aim and Design of pREGnant, the Dutch Pregnancy Drug Register.Drug safety · 2019Article
- Calls to a teratogen information service regarding potential exposures in pregnancy and breastfeeding.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2016Article
- Article
- Prenatal and perinatal analgesic exposure and autism: an ecological link.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral drugs that are known to exhibit teratogenic or fetotoxic risks when used during pregnancy should not be prescribed to pregnant women. However, most women of childbearing age use medications, and drug use cannot always be avoided during pregnancy, especially for women with chronic diseases for whom the benefit of treatment outweighs the potential risk of the drug for the fetus. Nevertheless, it is often possible to replace a drug with another one that has been better evaluated.
objectiveThe aim of the present study was to describe the prescribing of drugs to pregnant women before and during pregnancy in order to examine whether the occurrence of pregnancy modifies drug prescribing and dispensing to women. In particular, drugs that are contraindicated or must be avoided during pregnancy, such as retinoids, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, NSAIDs and valproic acid, will be analysed.
methodsThis retrolective study used data already prospectively recorded in the database of the French Health Insurance Service. It analysed pharmacy records of women who gave birth between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2007 in Midi-Pyrenees. Pharmacy data were analysed from 9 months before pregnancy until delivery. Drugs were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code.
resultsThe study included 23 898 women. Approximately 77% and 96% of the women received at least one prescription before and during pregnancy, respectively. The number of women who were prescribed contraindicated drugs significantly decreased with pregnancy (p < 0.0001). Most of the drugs were stopped during the 3 months before pregnancy without alternative treatment, even for chronic diseases. However, for some women, potentially dangerous prescriptions were maintained during pregnancy, and for others these drugs were dispensed for the first time during critical periods of pregnancy.
conclusionDespite recommendations, some teratogenic and/or fetotoxic drugs are still prescribed and dispensed to pregnant women in France. There is a need to repeat information to sensitize health professionals and women to the harmful potential of drugs. Moreover, discontinuation of a needed treatment must be avoided. Therefore, attention must be given to ensuring that younger females and women of childbearing potential who are likely to need continued treatment in adolescence and adulthood are aware of the potential risks that some drugs may pose during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.