Human pituitary adenomas. Recent advances in morphological studies.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

1. MRI Protocol for Pituitary Assessment in Children with Growth or Puberty Disorders-Is Gadolinium Contrast Administration Actually Needed?Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
   Article
2. Radiotherapy for non-functioning pituitary tumors--when and under what circumstances?Pituitary · 2003
   Review
3. The mammosomatotroph: a transitional cell between growth hormone and prolactin producing cells? An immunocytochemical study.Histochemistry · 1994
   Article
4. Corticotroph, somatotroph and mammotroph cell kinetics in the postnatal infant female rat.Histochemistry · 1993
   Article
5. Polymorphism of thyrotropin and alpha subunit in human pituitary adenomas.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 1993
   Article
6. Immunohistological studies for gastrointestinal and other hormones in acth-secreting adenomas.Endocrine pathology · 1992
   Article
7. Selective bilateral blood sampling from the inferior petrosal sinus in Cushing's disease: effects of corticotropin-releasing factor and thyrotropin-releasing hormone on pituitary secretion.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as