Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21660761›Full record

ReviewApplied neuropsychology2011

Designing rehabilitation programs for neglect: could 2 be more than 1+1?

Styrmir Saevarsson, Ulrike Halsband, Arni Kristjansson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied neuropsychology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Neglected premotor neglect.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  14. Novel insights in the rehabilitation of neglect.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2013
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Styrmir SaevarssonDepartment of Psychology, Neuropsychology, University of Freiburg, Germany. saevarsson@gatech.edu
Ulrike Halsband
Arni Kristjansson
Georgia Institute of Technology · USRMIT University · AUUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Dissociating Components of the Attentional Network in NeglectR01NS054266 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI RORDEN, CHRISTOPHER · 2006 to 2010
$1.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS05426NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unilateral neglect is a multimodal neuropsychological disorder that has puzzled scientists for a long time. Many interventions have been developed, but only a handful has proven to be effective. This review examines whether applying different therapeutic techniques in combination will increase therapeutic benefits. Studies were reviewed where therapies are applied sequentially or in combination with other techniques. The results indicate that combining different interventions leads to increased general improvement compared with other noncombined designs, even when the number of treatment sessions is not constant. Practical and theoretical aspects of different treatments are discussed. The combined approach to treatment may have direct relevance to disorders other than neglect. This report introduces a new classification scheme for different interventions with the aim of facilitating more focused therapy. Finally, suggestions are made as to what the focus of future studies of neglect therapy should be and how therapeutic benefits might be maximized.

Indexed as

Combined Modality TherapyHumansPerceptual DisordersPrognosisRecovery of FunctionRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID21660761
PMCPMC4544767
OpenAlexW2059372526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.