ReviewDer Pathologe2011
[Microscopic colitis: histopathological review with a clinicopathological correlation].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Melatonin Secretion and Metabolism Exponents in Patients with Ulcerative and Lymphocytic Colitis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Trial
- Article
- [Histopathology of microscopic colitis].Der Pathologe · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microscopic colitis is a clinicopathological entity which, in addition to typical symptoms such as watery diarrhea, is characterized by its specific histopathology. Since colonoscopy yields normal findings, microscopic colitis belongs in a histological domain. The term encompasses two forms: lymphocytic and collagenous colitis. Histologically, lymphocytic colitis shows an increase in intraepithelial lymphocytes of more than 20 lymphocytes per 100 surface colonocytes, while collagenous colitis is characterized by a thickened subepithelial collagen layer of more than 10 µm. Specific stains help in the quantification of both. Since microscopic colitis does not always affect the entire colon and the number of intraepithelial lymphocytes varies physiologically, obtaining stepwise biopsies of the colon (with information on location where possible) is recommended. A thickened collagen layer is relatively specific for collagenous colitis, whereas intraepithelial lymphocytosis is also found in other diseases. Therefore, to make a correct diagnosis, it is important to correlate histological findings with clinical symptoms, including the main symptom of watery diarrhea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.