ArticleInternational journal of nephrology2011
Relationship between Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Insertion/Deletion Gene Polymorphism and Susceptibility of Minimal Change Nephrotic Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis.
Article in International journal of nephrology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between insertion/deletion polymorphism in angiotensin-converting enzyme gene and acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis.BMC medical genetics · 2012Pooled it
- Effect of angiotensin converting enzyme gene I/D polymorphism in South Indian children with nephrotic syndrome.Journal of biomedical research · 2019Article
- Top Three Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine Applications at the Nexus of Renal Pathophysiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.Current pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the association between ACE I/D gene polymorphism and MCNS susceptibility. Method. A predefined literature search and selection of eligible relevant studies were performed to collect the data from electronic databases. Results. Six articles were identified for the analysis of association between ACE I/D gene polymorphism and MCNS risk, including 4 for Asians, one in Caucasian population and one for Africans. There was a markedly positive association between D allele or DD genotype and MCNS susceptibility in Asians (D: P = .01, DD: P = .02), but not for Caucasians and Africans (Caucasians: D: P = .16, DD: P = .98; Africans: D: P = .81, DD: P = .49). Furthermore, the II genotype seemed not to play a protective role against MCNS risk for Asians, Caucasians and Africans (P = .12, P = .09, P = .76, resp.). Interestingly, there was also significant association between ACE I/D gene polymorphism and MCNS susceptibility in overall populations (D: P = .007, DD: P = .04, II: P = .03). Conclusion. D allele or DD genotype might be a significant genetic molecular marker for MCNS susceptibility in Asians and overall populations, but not for Caucasians and Africans. More larger and rigorous genetic epidemiological investigations are required to further explore this association.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.