Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21659728›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of nephrology2011

Using stereologic techniques for podocyte counting in the mouse: shifting the paradigm.

Susanne B Nicholas, John M Basgen, Satyesh Sinha

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of nephrology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Estimating podocyte number and density using a single histologic section.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Estimation of glomerular podocyte number: a selection of valid methods.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susanne B NicholasDepartment of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. sunicholas@mednet.ucla.edu
John M Basgen
Satyesh Sinha
Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

VITAMIN D STIMULATES CARDIAC DIFFERENTIATIONU54RR026138 · NCRR · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED & SCI · PI NORRIS, KEITH C · 2009 to 2011
$14.0M
Genetics of Diabetic Nephropathy in Mexican-Americans a*U01DK057303 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI NICHOLAS, SUSANNE B · 1999 to 2006
$2.2M
NCRR NIH HHS 1U54RR026138NCRR NIH HHS U54 RR026138NIDDK NIH HHS DK08-057303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe podocyte serves the important function of maintaining the glomerular filtration barrier, and many studies report a decrease in podocyte number relative to the development of proteinuric states. However, there is significant inconsistency in the number of podocytes counted, possibly due to different counting methods. We previously counted the three glomerular cell types in the mouse kidney and showed that the fractionator/disector method is a close approximation of the exhaustive count or the gold standard method. In this study, we compared the commonly used model-based approach with the design-based approach to count podocytes in the db/m and db/db mouse and illustrate that the design-based approach, which uses the fractionator/disector method, provides an accurate determination of podocyte number.

methodsIn the design-based approach, toluidine blue-stained 1-μm-thick sections from glutaraldehyde perfusion-fixed kidneys were used (n = 15) with the fractionator/disector method. In the model-based approach, WT-1-immunolabeled podocyte nuclei in 3- to 4-μm-thick formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of the same kidneys were counted with the Weibel-Gomez method. Glomerular volume was determined for each method.

resultsWe discovered that the fractionator/disector method counted 89 ± 10 podocytes compared to the Weibel-Gomez method, which counted 137 ± 38 podocytes and overestimated podocyte number by 54% (p < 0.05). In addition, glomerular volume (231 ± 52 × 10(3) vs. 192 ± 64 × 10(3) μm(3)) was significantly underestimated by 17% (p < 0.0002). Moreover, the model-based approach was more time consuming.

conclusionWe conclude that the fractionator/disector method offers an unbiased and efficient determination of podocyte counts.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CountImmunohistochemistryMaleMiceMicrotomyPodocytesStaining and Labeling

Identifiers

PMID21659728
PMCPMC3121548
OpenAlexW2114218148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.