Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21659548›Full record

ArticleBlood2011

Analysis of glycoprotein E-selectin ligands on human and mouse marrow cells enriched for hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells.

Jasmeen S Merzaban, Monica M Burdick, S Zeineb Gadhoum, Nilesh M Dagia, Julia T Chu, Robert C Fuhlbrigge, Robert Sackstein

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CD34Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  9. The biology of E-selectin ligands in leukemogenesis.Advances in cancer research · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jasmeen S MerzabanDepartment of Dermatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Monica M Burdick
S Zeineb Gadhoum
Nilesh M Dagia
Julia T Chu
Robert C Fuhlbrigge
Robert Sackstein
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Optimizing Osteotropism of Human Mesenchymal Stem CellsR01HL073714 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SACKSTEIN, ROBERT · 2003 to 2010
$4.1M
Structure &Biology of Hematopoietic E-/L-SelectinR01HL060528 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SACKSTEIN, ROBERT · 1997 to 2006
$2.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL060528NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL073714NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL60528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although well recognized that expression of E-selectin on marrow microvessels mediates osteotropism of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs), our knowledge regarding the cognate E-selectin ligand(s) on HSPCs is incomplete. Flow cytometry using E-selectin-Ig chimera (E-Ig) shows that human marrow cells enriched for HSPCs (CD34(+) cells) display greater E-selectin binding than those obtained from mouse (lin(-)/Sca-1(+)/c-kit(+) [LSK] cells). To define the relevant glycoprotein E-selectin ligands, lysates from human CD34(+) and KG1a cells and from mouse LSK cells were immunoprecipitated using E-Ig and resolved by Western blot using E-Ig. In both human and mouse cells, E-selectin ligand reactivity was observed at ~ 120- to 130-kDa region, which contained two E-selectin ligands, the P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 glycoform "CLA," and CD43. Human, but not mouse, cells displayed a prominent ~ 100-kDa band, exclusively comprising the CD44 glycoform "HCELL." E-Ig reactivity was most prominent on CLA in mouse cells and on HCELL in human cells. To further assess HCELL's contribution to E-selectin adherence, complementary studies were performed to silence (via CD44 siRNA) or enforce its expression (via exoglycosylation). Under physiologic shear conditions, CD44/HCELL-silenced human cells showed striking decreases (> 50%) in E-selectin binding. Conversely, enforced HCELL expression of LSK cells profoundly increased E-selectin adherence, yielding > 3-fold more marrow homing in vivo. These data define the key glycoprotein E-selectin ligands of human and mouse HSPCs, unveiling critical species-intrinsic differences in both the identity and activity of these structures.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, CD34Cell LineCells, CulturedE-SelectinHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsLeukosialinLigandsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPolysaccharidesProtein BindingRNA, Small InterferingAntigens, CD34CD44 protein, humanE-SelectinHyaluronan ReceptorsLeukosialinLigandsPolysaccharidesRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID21659548
PMCPMC3158712
OpenAlexW2055044750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.