Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21659445›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

The impact of the electronic medical record on structure, process, and outcomes within primary care: a systematic review of the evidence.

Jayna M Holroyd-Leduc, Diane Lorenzetti, Sharon E Straus, Lindsay Sykes, Hude Quan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Home-based treatment for patients with hematological cancer in Denmark-A national overview.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  12. Visualization of Medical Record with 3D Human Body Models.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. How Can Implementation Science Advance Behavioral Interventions in Preschool? A Scoping Review and Recommendations.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  14. Integrating asthma care guidelines into primary care electronic medical records: a review focused on Canadian knowledge translation tools.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Basic electronic health record (EHR) adoption inBMC health services research · 2023
    Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jayna M Holroyd-LeducDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. jayna.holroyd-leduc@albertahealthservices.ca
Diane Lorenzetti
Sharon E Straus
Lindsay Sykes
Hude Quan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe electronic medical record (EMR)/electronic health record (EHR) is becoming an integral component of many primary-care outpatient practices. Before implementing an EMR/EHR system, primary-care practices should have an understanding of the potential benefits and limitations.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to systematically review the recent literature around the impact of the EMR/EHR within primary-care outpatient practices. MATERIALS AND

methodsSearches of Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, ABI Inform, and Cochrane Library were conducted to identify articles published between January 1998 and January 2010. The gray literature and reference lists of included articles were also searched. 30 studies met inclusion criteria. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The EMR/EHR appears to have structural and process benefits, but the impact on clinical outcomes is less clear. Using Donabedian's framework, five articles focused on the impact on healthcare structure, 21 explored healthcare process issues, and four focused on health-related outcomes.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareAmbulatory CareHumansPrimary Health CareUnited States

Identifiers

PMID21659445
PMCPMC3197985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.