Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21658727›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the neurological sciences2011

Quantitative differences in the immunomodulatory effects of Rebif and Avonex in IFN-β 1a treated multiple sclerosis patients.

George P Christophi, Jennifer A Christophi, Ross C Gruber, Cornelia Mihai, Luis J Mejico, Paul T Massa, Burk Jubelt

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the neurological sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Botanically-Derived ΔMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Improving Immunotherapy Through Glycodesign.Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

George P ChristophiDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
Jennifer A Christophi
Ross C Gruber
Cornelia Mihai
Luis J Mejico
Paul T Massa
Burk Jubelt
SUNY Upstate Medical University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

REGULATION OF INTERFERON ACTIVITY BY SHP-1 IN THE CNSR01NS041593 · NINDS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI MASSA, PAUL T · 2001 to 2007
$1.2M
Deficiency of SHP-1 expression and function in multiple sclerosisR01NS064116 · NINDS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI MASSA, PAUL T · 2009 to 2010
$707k
NINDS NIH HHS NS041593NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS041593NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interferon-β (IFN-β) is a current effective treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) and exerts its therapeutic effects by down-modulating the systemic immune response and cytokine signaling. In clinical practice there are several formulations of interferon including a low dose of IFN-β 1a formulation of 30 μg IM once weekly (Avonex) and a high dose formulation of 44 μg SC three times weekly (Rebif). Recent studies suggest that Rebif is more efficacious compared to Avonex in preventing relapses and decreasing MRI activity in relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) patients. This study examines whether there are quantitative gene expression changes in interferon-treated RRMS patients that can explain the difference in efficacy and side effects between Rebif and Avonex. Herein, RRMS patients were treated for three months with IFN-β 1a and the levels of plasma cytokines and gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were examined. Thirty-two normal subjects were compared to thirty-two RRMS patients, of which ten were treated with Rebif and ten with Avonex. Rebif and Avonex both significantly and equally suppressed plasma TNF-α and IL-6 levels. Rebif suppressed IL-13 significantly more than Avonex. Rebif also significantly suppressed the levels of the chemokines CCL17 and RANTES, the protease ADAM8, and COX-2 at a higher degree compared to Avonex. The STAT1-inducible genes IP-10 and caspase 1 were significantly increased with Rebif compared to Avonex. In conclusion, the higher dosed, more frequently administered IFN-β 1a Rebif when compared to IFN-β 1a Avonex has more potent immunomodulatory effects. These quantitative results might relate to efficacy and side-effect profile of the two IFN-β 1a formulations and provide prospective practical clinical tools to monitor treatment and adjust dosage.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugDown-RegulationDrug MonitoringFemaleGene Expression RegulationHumansImmunologic FactorsInterferon-betaInterferon beta-1aMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingSecondary PreventionUp-RegulationAdjuvants, ImmunologicImmunologic FactorsInterferon-betaInterferon beta-1a

Identifiers

PMID21658727
PMCPMC3395433
OpenAlexW2025262171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.