ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2012
The effect of K201 on isolated working rabbit heart mechanical function during pharmacologically induced Ca2+ overload.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novelties in the pharmacological approaches for chronic heart failure: new drugs and cardiovascular targets.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Specific nephrotoxicity and cardiotoxicity of BT-CAL®, Sigma Anti-bonding Molecule Calcium Carbonate, in mice.Laboratory animal research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeReduced cardiac contractility has been associated with disrupted myocardial Ca(2+) signalling. The 1,4 benzothiazepine K201 (JTV-519) acts on several Ca(2+) handling proteins and improves cardiac contractility in vivo in a variety of animal models of myocardial dysfunction. However, it is unclear whether this improvement depends on the systemic effects of K201 or if K201 reverses the effects of Ca(2+) dysregulation, regardless of the cause. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The effect of K201 on cardiac mechanical function was assessed in isolated working hearts from adult rabbits, using a ventricular pressure-volume catheter. In separate experiments, the effect of K201 was investigated in hearts following pharmacologically induced Ca(2+) overload using elevated extracellular [Ca(2+) ] ([Ca(2+) ](o) ) and β-adrenoceptor stimulation. KEY
resultsK201 induced a concentration-dependent decline in systolic function (peak pressure, dP/dt(max) and preload recruitable stroke work), lusitropy (reduced dP/dt(min) and increased end diastolic pressure) and stroke volume, independent of decreased heart rate. In separate experiments, mechanical function in hearts exposed to 4.5 mmol·L(-1) [Ca(2+) ](o) and 150 nmol·L(-1) isoprenaline declined until cessation of aortic flow (in 6 out of 11 hearts). However, all hearts perfused with the addition of 1 µmol·L(-1) K201 maintained aortic flow and demonstrated significantly improved peak systolic pressures, dP/dt(max) and dP/dt(min) . CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: K201 significantly improved mechanical function of the heart during Ca(2+) overload. This suggests that K201 can limit the detrimental effects of elevated intracellular Ca(2+) and exert beneficial effects on cardiac contractile function, independent of systemic effects previously observed in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.