Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21656739›Full record

Trial reportCancer2011

A phase 2 trial of gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and radiation therapy in locally advanced nonmetastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma : cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 80003.

Harvey J Mamon, Donna Niedzwiecki, Donna Hollis, Benjamin R Tan, Robert J Mayer, Joel E Tepper, Richard M Goldberg, A William Blackstock, Charles S Fuchs, Cancer and Leukemia Group B

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Advances in biomarker research for pancreatic cancer.Current pharmaceutical design · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Harvey J MamonDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA. hmamon@lroc.harvard.edu
Donna Niedzwiecki
Donna Hollis
Benjamin R Tan
Robert J Mayer
Joel E Tepper
Richard M Goldberg
A William Blackstock
Charles S Fuchs
Cancer and Leukemia Group B
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USDuke University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWake Forest University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP B MINORITY SATELLITE SUPPLEMENU10CA031946 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BERTAGNOLLI, MONICA M · 1985 to 2013
$158.4M
CANCER &LEUKEMIA GROUP B STATISTICAL CENTERU10CA033601 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SARGENT, DANIEL J. · 1985 to 2013
$69.4M
SOUTHEAST CANCER CONTROL COSORTIUM, INCU10CA045808 · NCI · SOUTHEAST CLINICAL ONCOL RES CONSORTIUM · PI ATKINS, JAMES NORMAN · 1987 to 2013
$26.6M
MEDICAL CENTER OF DELAWARE CCOPU10CA045418 · NCI · CHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC. · PI GRUBBS, STEPHEN S. · 1987 to 2014
$14.5M
MOUNT SINAI COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA045564 · NCI · MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER (MIAMI BEACH) · PI SCHWARTZ, MICHAEL ALAN · 1987 to 2014
$9.2M
SYRACUSE HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CCOPU10CA045389 · NCI · HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES/CTL NY · PI KIRSHNER, JEFFREY JAY · 1987 to 2014
$7.4M
NORTH SHORE UNIV COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035279 · NCI · NORTH SHORE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL · PI VINCIGUERRA, VINCENT P · 1985 to 2014
$7.3M
Cancer and Leukemia Group B - The Ohio State UniversityU10CA077658 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BLOOMFIELD, CLARA D · 1998 to 2013
$6.0M
CANCER &LEUKEMIA GROUP BU10CA032291 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI BURSTEIN, HAROLD J. · 1985 to 2013
$5.8M
CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP B--RPCI/SUNYABU10CA059518 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI LEVINE, ELLIS G · 1993 to 2013
$4.0M
CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP B (CALGB)U10CA003927 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HURD, DAVID D. · 1985 to 2008
$2.2M
CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP BU10CA047559 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SHEA, THOMAS C. · 1991 to 2013
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA03927NCI NIH HHS CA04326NCI NIH HHS CA07968NCI NIH HHS CA11789NCI NIH HHS CA12046NCI NIH HHS CA16450NCI NIH HHS CA32291NCI NIH HHS CA35279NCI NIH HHS CA45389NCI NIH HHS CA45418NCI NIH HHS CA45564NCI NIH HHS CA45808NCI NIH HHS CA47559NCI NIH HHS CA47642NCI NIH HHS CA59518NCI NIH HHS CA77406NCI NIH HHS CA77440NCI NIH HHS CA77597NCI NIH HHS CA77658NCI NIH HHS U10 CA031946NCI NIH HHS U10 CA033601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and gemcitabine administered concurrently with radiation in patients with locally advanced, nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer.

methodsEligible patients had histologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma deemed locally unresectable without evidence of metastatic disease. In addition, all patients underwent laparoscopy or laparotomy before study entry to rule out peritoneal carcinomatosis. Patients received radiation therapy (50.4 Gy) with concurrent infusional 5FU (200 mg/m(2) 5 days/week) and weekly gemcitabine (200 mg/m(2) ). After a 3-week break, patients received weekly gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m(2) for 3 of 4 weeks, for 4 cycles. The primary endpoint of the trial was the proportion of patients surviving 9 months from study entry. Secondary endpoints included objective tumor response, CA19-9 response, overall survival (OS) time to progression (TTP), and toxicity.

resultsBetween November 2001 and October 2004, 81 patients were enrolled, 78 of whom were eligible for analysis. With a median follow-up of 55.2 months, the median OS was 12.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.9-14.9) and the median TTP was 10 months (95% CI, 6.4-12.0). An objective tumor response was seen in 19 patients (25%), and among 56 patients with an elevated CA19-9 at baseline, 29 (52%) had a sustained CA19-9 response. Overall, 41% of patients had grade 3 or greater treatment-related gastrointestinal adverse events.

conclusionsThe combination of 5FU, gemcitabine, and radiation is well tolerated. Survival is comparable with the best results of other recent studies of 5FU and radiation or gemcitabine and radiation.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCA-19-9 AntigenCombined Modality TherapyDeoxycytidineFemaleFluorouracilGemcitabineHumansMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsCA-19-9 AntigenDeoxycytidineFluorouracilGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID21656739
PMCPMC3116970
OpenAlexW2018968005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.