Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21656514›Full record

ArticleCancer2011

Complications associated with erythropoietin-stimulating agents in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare study.

Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Hui Zhao, Shenying Fang, Tomasz P Srokowski, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Sharon H Giordano

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Erythropoietin-stimulating agents and clinical outcomes in metastatic breast cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia: a closed debate?Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mariana Chavez-MacGregorDivision of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Hui Zhao
Shenying Fang
Tomasz P Srokowski
Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Sharon H Giordano
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Adherence Among Older Women with Breast CancerK07CA109064 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI GIORDANO, SHARON HERMES · 2004 to 2009
$729k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA109064NCI NIH HHS K07-CA109064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe authors evaluated the patterns of use and the risk of thromboembolic events (TEE) associated with erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) in older patients with metastatic breast cancer who were receiving chemotherapy.

methodsThe study was retrospective and used the SEER-Medicare linked database. Stage IV breast cancer patients diagnosed from 1995-2005, treated with chemotherapy, ≥66 years old, with full coverage of Medicare A and B were included. The World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) and the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) were used to identify the use of ESAs, chemotherapy, and complications of therapy. Analyses included descriptive statistics and logistic regression.

resultsOf 2266 women, 980 (43.3%) received ESAs, and 1286 (56.7%) did not. Patients diagnosed after 1999 or who received treatment with taxanes, anthracyclines, or vinorelbine were more likely to receive ESAs. Patients receiving ESAs had higher rates of stroke (18.5% vs 15.1%, P = .031); deep-vein thrombosis (DVT; 21.3% vs 14.4%, P<.001), other/unspecified thromboembolic event (TEE; 19.8% vs 14.7%, P = .001), and any clot (31.3% vs 23.4%, P<.0001). In multivariate analysis, patients receiving ESAs had increased risk for DVT (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.75), and any clot (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.02-1.57). A dose-dependent effect was evident for stroke, DVT, other TEE, and any clot.

conclusionsIn this cohort of patients, the use of ESAs increased the risk of TEEs, with a dose-dependent effect for stroke, DVT, other TEE, and any clot. The data show that among patients treated with chemotherapy and ESAs for metastatic breast cancer, TEEs are a common event. Therefore, caution is recommended when using these agents.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsErythropoietinFemaleHumansMedicareNeoplasm MetastasisRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramStrokeThrombosisUnited StatesVenous ThrombosisErythropoietin

Identifiers

PMID21656514
PMCPMC3448281
OpenAlexW2050043748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.