Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21656346›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2012

Screening for vancomycin-resistant enterococci: an efficient and economical laboratory-developed test.

H Fang, A-K Ohlsson, G-X Jiang, M Ullberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Optimized detection of ESBL producers, carbapenemase producers, and VRE from rectal swabs using enrichment broth for superior screening sensitivity.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluation of species-specific PCR, Bruker MS, VITEK MS and the VITEK 2 system for the identification of clinical Enterococcus isolates.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H FangDivision of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, 141 86, Stockholm, Sweden. hong.fang@karolinska.se
A-K Ohlsson
G-X Jiang
M Ullberg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A laboratory-developed test (Lab Assay), combining enrichment broth and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) screening, was developed and evaluated in this study. A total of 1,765 faecal or rectal swabs sent to the laboratory for VRE screening were investigated in parallel by Lab Assay and the Roche LightCycler VRE detection kit-based method. The diagnostic values for Lab Assay were as follows: 100% sensitivity, 79.92% specificity, 1.94% positive predictive value and 100% negative predictive value, which were comparable to the results from the LightCycler kit-based assay. The detection limit of Lab Assay was 10(0) to 10(1) colony-forming units (CFU)/ml of inoculum in broth for both VanA-type and VanB-type VRE. The PCR method developed in this study was approved to be applicable on both the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System and the LightCycler(®) 480 Real-Time PCR System. The flexibility in choosing PCR systems makes it possible that the PCR assay could be fully compatible with the DNA extraction's platform, providing an integrated workflow. Furthermore, the material cost is saved at 7EUR per sample when Lab Assay replaces the commercial kit-based method in our routine screening for VRE. Therefore, the laboratory-developed broth-PCR method is an efficient and economical assay for VRE screening.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCarbon-Oxygen LigasesClinical Laboratory TechniquesDNA, BacterialEnterococcusFecesGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansLimit of DetectionMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPredictive Value of TestsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityVancomycinVancomycin ResistanceBacterial ProteinsCarbon-Oxygen LigasesDNA, BacterialVanA ligase, BacteriaVanB protein, EnterococcusVancomycin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.