Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21656179›Full record

Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2011

Efficacy and tolerability of split-dose PEG compared with split-dose aqueous sodium phosphate for outpatient colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial.

Eun Hee Seo, Tae Oh Kim, Tae Gyoon Kim, Hee Rin Joo, Min Jae Park, Jongha Park, Seung Ha Park, Sung Yeon Yang, Young Soo Moon

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01229800 phase3completednot on this map

Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Split-dose of PEG Compared With NaP Solution for Colonoscopy Preparation: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorInje UniversityRan2010 to 2010Enrolled207ConditionsBowel Preparation, Efficacy, Tolerability, SafetyArmsPolyethylene glycol, Sodium phosphate(NaP) solution
NCT01481714 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

Phase IV, Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Preparation the Day Before and Split-dose Regimen With Sodium Picosulphate/Magnesium Citrate for Morning Colonoscopies

TypeinterventionalSponsorInfante, Javier Molina, M.D.Ran2011 to 2012Enrolled300ConditionsBowel Cleansing, ColonoscopyArmsSodium picosulphate, magnesium oxid and citric acid, Sodium picosulphate/magnesium oxide and citric acid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electrolyte disturbances after bowel preparation for colonoscopy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eun Hee SeoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, 1435 Jwa-dong, Haeundae-gu, Busan, 612-030, Republic of Korea.
Tae Oh Kim
Tae Gyoon Kim
Hee Rin Joo
Min Jae Park
Jongha Park
Seung Ha Park
Sung Yeon Yang
Young Soo Moon
Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital · KRInje University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAdequate bowel cleansing is essential for a high-quality, effective, and safe colonoscopy. The aims of this study were to compare the efficacy and tolerability of split-dose polyethylene glycol with aqueous sodium phosphate for outpatients who underwent scheduled colonoscopy.

methodsIn this prospective trial, 207 outpatients (aged between 18 and 65 years, with normal renal function, at low risk for renal damage) were randomized to receive split-dose preparation of PEG (2 L/2 L) (N = 103) or NaP (45 mL/45 mL, 12 h apart) (N = 104) without strict diet restriction the day before colonoscopy. The bowel cleansing efficacy of preparations was rated according to the Ottawa scale and the patient tolerability was assessed using a patient questionnaire.

resultsThere was no significant difference between the two groups for the mean total score using the Ottawa bowel preparation scale (P = 0.181). Significantly greater residual colonic fluid was observed in the split-dose PEG group (1.24 ± 0.49) than in the NaP group (1.04 ± 0.53) (P = 0.007). Patient compliance, preference, and acceptance of a two preparation regimen were similar with no significant differences (P = 0.095, P = 0.280 and P = 0.408, respectively). The overall incidence of adverse events was not significantly different between the two groups; however, the split-dose PEG group tended to have fewer adverse events (52/103 [50.5%], 66/104 [63.5%], P = 0.059) and had significantly less nausea and vomiting (P = 0.036).

conclusionsSplit-dose PEG, compared with split-dose NaP, is associated with more residual colonic fluid, but produces equivalent colon cleansing efficacy and results in less nausea and vomiting, which might improve patient tolerability (clinical trial registration number NCT01229800).

Indexed as

OutpatientsAdultCatharticsColonoscopyDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNauseaPatient CompliancePatient SatisfactionPhosphatesPolyethylene GlycolsProspective StudiesCatharticsPhosphatesPolyethylene Glycolssodium phosphate

Identifiers

PMID21656179
PMCPMC3179840
OpenAlexW1988912376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.