Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21656124›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2012

Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists alter select behaviors in a mouse model for fragile X syndrome.

Alexia M Thomas, Nghiem Bui, Jennifer R Perkins, Lisa A Yuva-Paylor, Richard Paylor

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Glutamatergic candidate genes in autism spectrum disorder: an overview.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Targeted Treatments for Fragile X Syndrome.Advances in neurobiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Group 1 Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors in Neurological and Psychiatric Diseases: Mechanisms and Prospective.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Autism Spectrum Disorder: Focus on Glutamatergic Neurotransmission.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexia M ThomasDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Nghiem Bui
Jennifer R Perkins
Lisa A Yuva-Paylor
Richard Paylor
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

PROGRAM IN HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICST32GM008307 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SHAULSKY, GAD · 1990 to 2020
$6.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM08307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleStudies in the Fmr1 knockout (KO) mouse, a model of fragile X syndrome (FXS), suggest that excessive signaling through group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), comprised of subtypes mGluR1 and mGluR5, may play a role in the pathogenesis of FXS. Currently, no studies have assessed the effect of mGluR1 modulation on Fmr1 KO behavior, and there has not been an extensive behavioral analysis of mGluR5 manipulation in Fmr1 KO mice.

objectivesThe goals for this study were to determine if pharmacologic blockade of mGluR1 may affect Fmr1 KO behavior as well as to expand on the current literature regarding pharmacologic blockade of mGluR5 on Fmr1 KO behavior.

methodsReduction of mGluR1 or mGluR5 activity was evaluated on a variety of behavioral assays in wild-type (WT) and Fmr1 KO mice through the use of antagonists: JNJ16259685 (JNJ, mGluR1 antagonist) and MPEP (mGluR5 antagonist).

resultsJNJ and MPEP decreased marble burying in both WT and Fmr1 KO mice without reductions in activity. Neither JNJ nor MPEP affected the prepulse inhibition in either WT or Fmr1 KO mice. JNJ did not affect Fmr1 KO motor coordination but did impair WT performance. MPEP improved a measure of motor learning in Fmr1 KO but not WT mice. While both JNJ and MPEP decreased the audiogenic seizures in the Fmr1 KO, MPEP completely abolished the manifestation of seizures.

conclusionThese data illustrate that, while the manipulation of either mGluR1 or mGluR5 can affect select behaviors in the Fmr1 KO, we observe greater effects upon mGluR5 reduction.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAcoustic StimulationAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Fragile X SyndromeMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutQuinolinesReceptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5Receptors, Metabotropic GlutamateReflex, Startle(3,4-dihydro-2H-pyrano(2,3)b-quinolin-7-yl)-(cis-4-methoxycyclohexyl) methanoneFmr1 protein, mouseFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Grm5 protein, mousemetabotropic glutamate receptor type 1QuinolinesReceptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5Receptors, Metabotropic Glutamate

Identifiers

PMID21656124
OpenAlexW2040563577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.