ArticleMolecular biotechnology2012
Pyrosequence analysis of unamplified and whole genome amplified DNA from hydrocarbon-contaminated groundwater.
Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anthropogenic pollution gradient along a mountain river affects bacterial community composition and genera with potential pathogenic species.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Acinetobacter sp. DW-1 immobilized on polyhedron hollow polypropylene balls and analysis of transcriptome and proteome of the bacterium during phenol biodegradation process.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Environmental Viral Metagenomics Analyses in Aquaculture: Applications in Epidemiology and Disease Control.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Review
- Nanoarchaeota, Their Sulfolobales Host, and Nanoarchaeota Virus Distribution across Yellowstone National Park Hot Springs.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2015Article
- Metagenomic analysis of the airborne environment in urban spaces.Microbial ecology · 2015Article
- CoMeta: classification of metagenomes using k-mers.PloS one · 2015Article
- Census-based rapid and accurate metagenome taxonomic profiling.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Distinctive microbial community structure in highly stratified deep-sea brine water columns.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2013Article
- Viruses in the desert: a metagenomic survey of viral communities in four perennial ponds of the Mauritanian Sahara.The ISME journal · 2013Article
- A pyrosequencing-based metagenomic study of methane-producing microbial community in solid-state biogas reactor.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2013Article
- Metagenomics - a guide from sampling to data analysis.Microbial informatics and experimentation · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pyrosequence data was used to analyze the composition and metabolic potential of a metagenome from a hydrocarbon-contaminated site. Unamplified and whole genome amplified (WGA) sequence data was compared from this source. According to MG-RAST, an additional 2,742,252 bp of DNA was obtained with the WGA, indicating that WGA has the ability to generate a large amount of DNA from a small amount of starting sample. However, it was observed that WGA introduced a bias with respect to the distribution of the amplified DNA and the types of microbial populations that were accessed from the metagenome. The dominant order in the WGA metagenome was Flavobacteriales, whereas the unamplified metagenome was dominated by Actinomycetales as determined by RDPII and CARMA databases. According to the SEED database, the subsystems shown to be present for the individual metagenomes were associated with the metabolic potential that was expected to be present in the contaminated groundwater, such as the metabolism of aromatic compounds. A higher percentage (4.4) of genes associated with the metabolism of aromatic compounds was identified in the unamplified metagenome when compared to the WGA metagenome (0.66%). This could be attributed to the increased number of hydrocarbon degrading bacteria that had been accessed from this metagenome (Mycobacteria, Nocardia, Brevibacteria, Clavibacter, Rubrobacter, and Rhodoccocus). Therefore, it was possible to relate the taxonomic groups accessed to the contamination profile of the metagenome. By collating the sequencing data obtained pre- and post-amplification, this study provided insight regarding the survival strategies of microbial communities inhabiting contaminated environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.