Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21655999›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2011

[Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the appendix and colorectum].

G Klöppel, H Scherübl

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Rectal neuroendocrine tumors: endoscopic therapy].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G KlöppelInstitut für Pathologie, Technische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Deutschland. guenter.kloeppel@alumni.uni-kiel.de
H Scherübl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Appropriate diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the appendix and colorectum requires a detailed knowledge of their proper classification according to the updated WHO and TNM systems. The WHO classification distinguishes well differentiated NEN, the neuroendocrine tumors (G1 and G2 NETs), from the poorly differentiated carcinomas (G3 NECs). While NETs are common in the appendix and rectum, NECs occur predominantly in the colon. G1 appendiceal and rectal NETs of 1 cm in size or below that do not invade either the muscular wall or vessels bear almost no metastatic risk and can be treated by appendectomy or endoscopic resection. G2 appendiceal and rectal NETs larger than 1 cm in size in combination with other risk factors have an increased risk of metastasis and need to be treated more aggressively. NECs of the colon usually require chemotherapy in addition to resection. Today, most patients with NETs of the appendix and rectum have an excellent prognosis when these diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines are borne in mind.

Indexed as

Appendiceal NeoplasmsCell Transformation, NeoplasticColonColorectal NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm StagingNeuroendocrine TumorsPrognosisRectumWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.