Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21655934›Full record

Trial reportQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2012

Patient education methods to support quality of life and functional ability among patients with schizophrenia: a randomised clinical trial.

Anneli Pitkänen, Maritta Välimäki, Lauri Kuosmanen, Jouko Katajisto, Marita Koivunen, Heli Hätönen, Anita Patel, Martin Knapp

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. General physical health advice for people with serious mental illness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Discriminant and convergent validity of a subjective quality-of-life instrument aimed at high content validity for schizophrenic persons.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anneli PitkänenDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. anneli.pitkanen@pshp.fi
Maritta Välimäki
Lauri Kuosmanen
Jouko Katajisto
Marita Koivunen
Heli Hätönen
Anita Patel
Martin Knapp
University of Turku · FIKing's College London · GBSatakunta Central Hospital · FITurku University of Applied Sciences · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to estimate the effectiveness of patient education methods on quality of life and functional impairment of patients with schizophrenia.

methodsA multicentre, randomized controlled trial was carried out in two psychiatric hospitals in Finland from March 2005 to October 2007. A total of 311 patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizotypal disorder or delusional disorder were randomly allocated to computer-based patient education (n = 100), conventional education with standard leaflets (n = 106) and standard treatment (n = 105). Participants were followed up 12 months later. Primary outcome was quality of life (Q-LES-Q-SF) and secondary outcome was functional disability (SDS). Analysis was performed by intention-to-treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN74919979.

resultsPatients' global quality of life improved and functional disability decreased significantly in all education groups over the follow-up time. There were no significant differences between groups in these outcomes.

conclusionsIn light of the findings there is no evidence to support a particular education method as the best way to improve patients' quality of life or improve functional ability. On the other hand, no intervention was found to be harmful. Thus computer-based patient education may be a suitable alternative for some patients. While information technology will be more widely used in societies, computer-based intervention may be beneficial for some patients with serious mental disorders.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingAdolescentAdultAgedDisability EvaluationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSchizophreniaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21655934
OpenAlexW2017531687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.