ArticlePhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP2011
Why not consider a spherical protein? Implications of backbone hydrogen bonding for protein structure and function.
Article in Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of local versus nonlocal physicochemical restraints in determining protein native structure.Current opinion in structural biology · 2021Review
- How Do Amides Affect the Electronic Properties of Pyrene?ACS omega · 2018Article
- In silico structure-based approaches to discover protein-protein interaction-targeting drugs.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2017Review
- An Evolution-Based Approach to De Novo Protein Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017Article
- How special is the biochemical function of native proteins?F1000Research · 2016Review
- Implications of the small number of distinct ligand binding pockets in proteins for drug discovery, evolution and biochemical function.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters · 2015Review
- On the role of physics and evolution in dictating protein structure and function.Israel journal of chemistry · 2014Article
- Interplay of physics and evolution in the likely origin of protein biochemical function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Article
- A method to predict edge strands in beta-sheets from protein sequences.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2013Article
- An artificial neural network approach to improving the correlation between protein energetics and the backbone structure.Proteomics · 2013Article
- Further evidence for the likely completeness of the library of solved single domain protein structures.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2012Article
- The distribution of ligand-binding pockets around protein-protein interfaces suggests a general mechanism for pocket formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012Article
- Why not consider a spherical protein? Implications of backbone hydrogen bonding for protein structure and function.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The intrinsic ability of protein structures to exhibit the geometric features required for molecular function in the absence of evolution is examined in the context of three systems: the reference set of real, single domain protein structures, a library of computationally generated, compact homopolypeptides, artificial structures with protein-like secondary structural elements, and quasi-spherical random proteins packed at the same density as proteins but lacking backbone secondary structure and hydrogen bonding. Without any evolutionary selection, the library of artificial structures has similar backbone hydrogen bonding, global shape, surface to volume ratio and statistically significant structural matches to real protein global structures. Moreover, these artificial structures have native like ligand binding cavities, and a tiny subset has interfacial geometries consistent with native-like protein-protein interactions and DNA binding. In contrast, the quasi-spherical random proteins, being devoid of secondary structure, have a lower surface to volume ratio and lack ligand binding pockets and intermolecular interaction interfaces. Surprisingly, these quasi-spherical random proteins exhibit protein like distributions of virtual bond angles and almost all have a statistically significant structural match to real protein structures. This implies that it is local chain stiffness, even without backbone hydrogen bonding, and compactness that give rise to the likely completeness of the library solved single domain protein structures. These studies also suggest that the packing of secondary structural elements generates the requisite geometry for intermolecular binding. Thus, backbone hydrogen bonding plays an important role not only in protein structure but also in protein function. Such ability to bind biological molecules is an inherent feature of protein structure; if combined with appropriate protein sequences, it could provide the non-zero background probability for low-level function that evolution requires for selection to occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.