Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21655593›Full record

ArticlePhysical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP2011

Why not consider a spherical protein? Implications of backbone hydrogen bonding for protein structure and function.

Michal Brylinski, Mu Gao, Jeffrey Skolnick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. An Evolution-Based Approach to De Novo Protein Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Interplay of physics and evolution in the likely origin of protein biochemical function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  9. A method to predict edge strands in beta-sheets from protein sequences.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The distribution of ligand-binding pockets around protein-protein interfaces suggests a general mechanism for pocket formation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michal BrylinskiCenter for the Study of Systems Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 250 14th St NW, Atlanta, GA 30076, USA.
Mu Gao
Jeffrey Skolnick
Georgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Interaction Pattern Based Predictor of Protein StruturesR01GM048835 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SKOLNICK, JEFFREY · 1994 to 2015
$4.0M
THEORY OF FOLDING TRANSITIONS IN A-HELICAL PROTEINSR01GM037408 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SKOLNICK, JEFFREY · 1987 to 2014
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-48835NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037408NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM048835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intrinsic ability of protein structures to exhibit the geometric features required for molecular function in the absence of evolution is examined in the context of three systems: the reference set of real, single domain protein structures, a library of computationally generated, compact homopolypeptides, artificial structures with protein-like secondary structural elements, and quasi-spherical random proteins packed at the same density as proteins but lacking backbone secondary structure and hydrogen bonding. Without any evolutionary selection, the library of artificial structures has similar backbone hydrogen bonding, global shape, surface to volume ratio and statistically significant structural matches to real protein global structures. Moreover, these artificial structures have native like ligand binding cavities, and a tiny subset has interfacial geometries consistent with native-like protein-protein interactions and DNA binding. In contrast, the quasi-spherical random proteins, being devoid of secondary structure, have a lower surface to volume ratio and lack ligand binding pockets and intermolecular interaction interfaces. Surprisingly, these quasi-spherical random proteins exhibit protein like distributions of virtual bond angles and almost all have a statistically significant structural match to real protein structures. This implies that it is local chain stiffness, even without backbone hydrogen bonding, and compactness that give rise to the likely completeness of the library solved single domain protein structures. These studies also suggest that the packing of secondary structural elements generates the requisite geometry for intermolecular binding. Thus, backbone hydrogen bonding plays an important role not only in protein structure but also in protein function. Such ability to bind biological molecules is an inherent feature of protein structure; if combined with appropriate protein sequences, it could provide the non-zero background probability for low-level function that evolution requires for selection to occur.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesDatabases, ProteinDNAHumansHydrogen BondingModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProteinsProtein Structure, SecondaryDNAProteins

Identifiers

PMID21655593
PMCPMC3289135
OpenAlexW2139900492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.