Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21655259›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Variability in pediatric infectious disease consultants' recommendations for management of community-acquired pneumonia.

Adam L Hersh, Daniel J Shapiro, Jason G Newland, Philip M Polgreen, Susan E Beekmann, Samir S Shah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Chinese medicinal herbs for childhood pneumonia: a systematic review of effectiveness and safety.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Adam L HershPediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America. adam.hersh@hsc.utah.edu
Daniel J Shapiro
Jason G Newland
Philip M Polgreen
Susan E Beekmann
Samir S Shah
University of Iowa · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USChildren's Mercy Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

NICHD Institutional Training for PediatriciansT32HD044331 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERRIERO, DONNA M. · 2003 to 2012
$2.5M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD044331PHS HHS U50 CCU112346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a common childhood infection. CAP complications, such as parapneumonic empyema (PPE), are increasing and are frequently caused by antibiotic-resistant organisms. No clinical guidelines currently exist for management of pediatric CAP and no published data exist about variations in antibiotic prescribing patterns. Our objectives were to describe variation in CAP clinical management for hospitalized children by pediatric infectious disease consultants and to examine associations between recommended antibiotic regimens and local antibiotic resistance levels.

methodsWe surveyed pediatric members of the Emerging Infections Network, which consists of 259 pediatric infectious disease physicians. Participants responded regarding their recommended empiric antibiotic regimens for hospitalized children with CAP with and without PPE and their recommendations for duration of therapy. Participants also provided information about the prevalence of penicillin non-susceptible S. pneumoniae and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in their community.

resultsWe received 148 responses (57%). For uncomplicated CAP, respondents were divided between recommending beta-lactams alone (55%) versus beta-lactams in combination with another class (40%). For PPE, most recommended a combination of a beta-lactam plus an anti-MRSA agent, however, they were divided between clindamycin (44%) and vancomycin (57%). The relationship between reported antibiotic resistance and empiric regimen was mixed. We found no relationship between aminopenicillin use and prevalence of penicillin non-suscepetible S. pneumoniae or clindamycin use and clindamycin resistance, however, respondents were more likely to recommend an anti-MRSA agent when MRSA prevalence increased.

conclusionsSubstantial variability exists in recommendations for CAP management. Development of clinical guidelines via antimicrobial stewardship programs and dissemination of data about local antibiotic resistance patterns represent opportunities to improve care.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsClindamycinCommunity-Acquired InfectionsData CollectionHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPneumoniaVancomycinAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsClindamycinVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID21655259
PMCPMC3105054
OpenAlexW1975216096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.