Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21655224›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

The strength and timing of the mitochondrial bottleneck in salmon suggests a conserved mechanism in vertebrates.

Jonci N Wolff, Daniel J White, Michael Woodhams, Helen E White, Neil J Gemmell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Mitochondria in reproduction.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Sorting of mitochondrial and plastid heteroplasmy inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Mitochondrial DNA content in eggs as a maternal effect.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Evolving mtDNA populations within cells.Biochemical Society transactions · 2019
    Review
  10. Varied Mechanisms and Models for the Varying Mitochondrial Bottleneck.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Evolution: are the monkeys' typewriters rigged?Royal Society open science · 2014
    Article
  20. Regular bottlenecks and restrictions to somatic fusion prevent the accumulation of mitochondrial defects in Neurospora.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonci N WolffSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.
Daniel J White
Michael Woodhams
Helen E White
Neil J Gemmell

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most species mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is inherited maternally in an apparently clonal fashion, although how this is achieved remains uncertain. Population genetic studies show not only that individuals can harbor more than one type of mtDNA (heteroplasmy) but that heteroplasmy is common and widespread across a diversity of taxa. Females harboring a mixture of mtDNAs may transmit varying proportions of each mtDNA type (haplotype) to their offspring. However, mtDNA variants are also observed to segregate rapidly between generations despite the high mtDNA copy number in the oocyte, which suggests a genetic bottleneck acts during mtDNA transmission. Understanding the size and timing of this bottleneck is important for interpreting population genetic relationships and for predicting the inheritance of mtDNA based disease, but despite its importance the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Empirical studies, restricted to mice, have shown that the mtDNA bottleneck could act either at embryogenesis, oogenesis or both. To investigate whether the size and timing of the mitochondrial bottleneck is conserved between distant vertebrates, we measured the genetic variance in mtDNA heteroplasmy at three developmental stages (female, ova and fry) in chinook salmon and applied a new mathematical model to estimate the number of segregating units (N(e)) of the mitochondrial bottleneck between each stage. Using these data we estimate values for mtDNA Ne of 88.3 for oogenesis, and 80.3 for embryogenesis. Our results confirm the presence of a mitochondrial bottleneck in fish, and show that segregation of mtDNA variation is effectively complete by the end of oogenesis. Considering the extensive differences in reproductive physiology between fish and mammals, our results suggest the mechanism underlying the mtDNA bottleneck is conserved in these distant vertebrates both in terms of it magnitude and timing. This finding may lead to improvements in our understanding of mitochondrial disorders and population interpretations using mtDNA data.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA, MitochondrialFemaleHumansMaleMiceModels, BiologicalSalmonVertebratesDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID21655224
PMCPMC3105079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.